<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=VanessaPohl</id>
	<title>British Culture - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=VanessaPohl"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php/Special:Contributions/VanessaPohl"/>
	<updated>2026-05-11T16:56:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5642</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5642"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T20:39:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narrative starting with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (&amp;quot;The Murders in the Rue Morgue&amp;quot;, 1841). However, several British writers also played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police -  nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it reflected broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity” [http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of [[Charles Dickens|Dickens]] (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the 19th-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, [[Charles Dickens]] wrote a series of non-fictional articles praising the work of the London police for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039; (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, he applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In his detective stories, Conan Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that the author famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conan Doyle&#039;s stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. &#039;&#039;Sherlock&#039;&#039;, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5641</id>
		<title>Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5641"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T18:25:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1857-58. Unsuccessful rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebellion, India became a British crown colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
Still widely used, the term &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; is increasingly regarded as problematic as it does not account for the involvement of Indian civilians in the rebellion. Suggestions for alternative terms include the &#039;Uprising of 1857&#039; and &#039;Indian War&#039;. Indian nationalist historians have dubbed the uprising the first &#039;Indian War of Independence&#039;, a term in turn disputed by western scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Causes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The outbreak of the rebellion was preceded by mounting discontent with British rule among various sections of the Indian population. Contributing factors were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the increased Christian missionary activity&lt;br /&gt;
* drastic social and economic reforms intended to &#039;anglicise&#039; India&lt;br /&gt;
* further territorial annexations by the EIC (the Punjab in 1848 and Oudh in 1856)&lt;br /&gt;
* the reduction of pensions paid to displaced native rulers&lt;br /&gt;
* the decline in the wages for Indian mercenaries and the cultural insensitivity of their British officers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trigger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The British EIC, which had risen from a private commercial venture to paramount territorial power in India in the 18th century, had equipped its troops with a new weapon – the Enfield rifle. In order to load it, the soldiers had to bite off the ends of greased cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon rumours were circulating among the EIC&#039;s Indian mercenaries (&#039;&#039;sepoys&#039;&#039;) that the grease used for the cartridges consisted of a mixture of pork and beef fat. Using them would thus have resulted in a serious breach of religious laws for Hindus and Muslims alike. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 9th May 1857, 85 sepoys stationed in Meerut near Delhi were publicly degraded and imprisoned for refusing to use the cartridges. On the following day, their comrades mutinied: they released the prisoners, killed their British officers and other Europeans, and then set off for Delhi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Course ==&lt;br /&gt;
The mutineers seized Delhi and proclaimed Bahādur Shāh II, the disempowered last Mughal Emperor, their leader. The rebellion spread rapidly throughout northern and central India. In some regions, military mutinies were accompanied by civil uprisings that involved almost all sections of the population. However, most of the Indian princes stayed aloof from the hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In British representations of the uprising, two events in particular were emphasized, both of which concerned the suffering of British civilians at the hands of Indian insurgents: the murder of 200 British women and children in Cawnpore and the five-month siege of the provincial capital of Lucknow by rebel forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, Indians came to remember the British campaign of retaliation as &#039;the Devil&#039;s Wind&#039;. Native villages were razed to the ground; Indian civilians and fighters were tortured, summarily hanged or bound to the mouths of canons which would blow their bodies to pieces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After more than a year of fighting, the British succeeded in suppressing the rebellion, and peace was officially declared on 8th July 1858, although guerrilla warfare went on for some time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The major political results of the uprising were the dissolution of the EIC and the transfer of its powers and territories to the British Crown. In 1858, India was turned into an &#039;official&#039; colony ruled by a British viceroy. Queen Victoria was proclaimed &#039;Empress of India&#039; at the &#039;&#039;Imperial Durbar&#039;&#039; of 1877. The subcontinent, often called Britain&#039;s &#039;jewel in the crown&#039;, became a very profitable part of the Empire in economic terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually, British collective memory transformed the uprising into a Social Darwinist &#039;myth&#039;, in which the British victory seemed to prove that they were the &#039;fitter’ race. This feeling of racial superiority was to serve as the new legitimation of British rule. Disappointed at the perceived ingratitude of the Indians, the British now increasingly saw them as uneducable and unfit for self-government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning. “Der indische Aufstand (&#039;&#039;Indian Mutiny&#039;&#039;) (1857).“ &#039;&#039;Handbuch der britischen Kulturgeschichte. Daten, Fakten, Hintergründe von der römischen Eroberung bis zur Gegenwart.&#039;&#039; Ed. Rudolf Beck and Konrad Schöder. Paderborn: Fink, 2006. 301-307.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judd, Denis. &#039;&#039;Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present.&#039;&#039; London: &lt;br /&gt;
HarperCollins, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kuah, Desmond. “The Epic of Race: The Indian Mutiny, 1857.” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/epic.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landow, George P. “The 1857 Indian Mutiny (Also Known as the Sepoy Rebellion, the Great Mutiny, and the Revolt of 1857).” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/1857.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porter, Bernhard. &#039;&#039;The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1995.&#039;&#039; 3rd ed. London: Longman, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothermund, Dietmar. &#039;&#039;Geschichte Indiens: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart&#039;&#039;. 2nd, rev. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streets, Heather. “Indian War.” &#039;&#039;Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World.&#039;&#039; Ed. Peter N. &lt;br /&gt;
Stearns. Oxford University Press 2008. 24 April 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-modernworld.com/entry?entry=t254.e750&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, A.N. &#039;&#039;The Victorians.&#039;&#039; New York: Norton, 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5640</id>
		<title>Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5640"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T18:23:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1857-58. Unsuccessful rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebellion, India became a British crown colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
Still widely used, the term &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; is increasingly regarded as problematic as it does not account for the involvement of Indian civilians in the rebellion. Suggestions for alternative terms include the &#039;Uprising of 1857&#039; and &#039;Indian War&#039;. Indian nationalist historians have dubbed the uprising the first &#039;Indian War of Independence&#039;, a term in turn disputed by western scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Causes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The outbreak of the rebellion was preceded by mounting discontent with British rule among various sections of the Indian population. Contributing factors were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the increased Christian missionary activity&lt;br /&gt;
* drastic social and economic reforms intended to &#039;anglicise&#039; India&lt;br /&gt;
* further territorial annexations by the EIC (the Punjab in 1848 and Oudh in 1856)&lt;br /&gt;
* the reduction of pensions paid to displaced native rulers&lt;br /&gt;
* the decline in the wages for Indian mercenaries and the cultural insensitivity of their British officers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trigger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The British EIC, which had risen from a private commercial venture to paramount territorial power in India in the 18th century, had equipped its troops with a new weapon – the Enfield rifle. In order to load it, the soldiers had to bite off the ends of greased cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon rumours were circulating among the EIC&#039;s Indian mercenaries (&#039;&#039;sepoys&#039;&#039;) that the grease used for the cartridges consisted of a mixture of pork and beef fat. Using them would thus have resulted in a serious breach of religious laws for both Hindu and Muslim sepoys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 9th May 1857, 85 sepoys stationed in Meerut near Delhi were publicly degraded and imprisoned for refusing to use the cartridges. On the following day, their comrades mutinied: they released the prisoners, killed their British officers and other Europeans, and then set off for Delhi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Course ==&lt;br /&gt;
The mutineers seized Delhi and proclaimed Bahādur Shāh II, the disempowered last Mughal Emperor, their leader. The rebellion spread rapidly throughout northern and central India. In some regions, military mutinies were accompanied by civil uprisings that involved almost all sections of the population. However, most of the Indian princes stayed aloof from the hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In British representations of the uprising, two events in particular were emphasized, both of which concerned the suffering of British civilians at the hands of Indian insurgents: the murder of 200 British women and children in Cawnpore and the five-month siege of the provincial capital of Lucknow by rebel forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, Indians came to remember the British campaign of retaliation as &#039;the Devil&#039;s Wind&#039;. Native villages were razed to the ground; Indian civilians and fighters were tortured, summarily hanged or bound to the mouths of canons which would blow their bodies to pieces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After more than a year of fighting, the British succeeded in suppressing the rebellion, and peace was officially declared on 8th July 1858, although guerrilla warfare went on for some time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The major political results of the uprising were the dissolution of the EIC and the transfer of its powers and territories to the British Crown. In 1858, India was turned into an &#039;official&#039; colony ruled by a British viceroy. Queen Victoria was proclaimed &#039;Empress of India&#039; at the &#039;&#039;Imperial Durbar&#039;&#039; of 1877. The subcontinent, often called Britain&#039;s &#039;jewel in the crown&#039;, became a very profitable part of the Empire in economic terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually, British collective memory transformed the uprising into a Social Darwinist &#039;myth&#039;, in which the British victory seemed to prove that they were the &#039;fitter’ race. This feeling of racial superiority was to serve as the new legitimation of British rule. Disappointed at the perceived ingratitude of the Indians, the British now increasingly saw them as uneducable and unfit for self-government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning. “Der indische Aufstand (&#039;&#039;Indian Mutiny&#039;&#039;) (1857).“ &#039;&#039;Handbuch der britischen Kulturgeschichte. Daten, Fakten, Hintergründe von der römischen Eroberung bis zur Gegenwart.&#039;&#039; Ed. Rudolf Beck and Konrad Schöder. Paderborn: Fink, 2006. 301-307.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judd, Denis. &#039;&#039;Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present.&#039;&#039; London: &lt;br /&gt;
HarperCollins, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kuah, Desmond. “The Epic of Race: The Indian Mutiny, 1857.” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/epic.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landow, George P. “The 1857 Indian Mutiny (Also Known as the Sepoy Rebellion, the Great Mutiny, and the Revolt of 1857).” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/1857.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porter, Bernhard. &#039;&#039;The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1995.&#039;&#039; 3rd ed. London: Longman, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothermund, Dietmar. &#039;&#039;Geschichte Indiens: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart&#039;&#039;. 2nd, rev. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streets, Heather. “Indian War.” &#039;&#039;Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World.&#039;&#039; Ed. Peter N. &lt;br /&gt;
Stearns. Oxford University Press 2008. 24 April 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-modernworld.com/entry?entry=t254.e750&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, A.N. &#039;&#039;The Victorians.&#039;&#039; New York: Norton, 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5639</id>
		<title>Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5639"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T18:19:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1857-58. Unsuccessful rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebellion, India became a British crown colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
Still widely used, the term &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; is increasingly regarded as problematic as it does not account for the involvement of Indian civilians in the rebellion. Suggestions for alternate terms include the &#039;Uprising of 1857&#039; and &#039;Indian War&#039;. Indian nationalist historians have dubbed the uprising the first &#039;Indian War of Independence&#039;, a term in turn disputed by western scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Causes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The outbreak of the rebellion was preceded by mounting discontent with British rule among various sections of the Indian population. Contributing factors were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the increased Christian missionary activity&lt;br /&gt;
* drastic social and economic reforms intended to &#039;anglicise&#039; India&lt;br /&gt;
* further territorial annexations by the EIC (the Punjab in 1848 and Oudh in 1856)&lt;br /&gt;
* the reduction of pensions paid to displaced native rulers&lt;br /&gt;
* the decline in the wages for Indian mercenaries and the cultural insensitivity of their British officers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trigger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The British EIC, which had risen from a private commercial venture to paramount territorial power in India in the 18th century, had equipped its troops with a new weapon – the Enfield rifle. In order to load it, the soldiers had to bite off the ends of greased cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon rumours were circulating among the EIC&#039;s Indian mercenaries (&#039;&#039;sepoys&#039;&#039;) that the grease used for the cartridges consisted of a mixture of pork and beef fat. Using them would thus have resulted in a serious breach of religious laws for both Hindu and Muslim sepoys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 9th May 1857, 85 sepoys stationed in Meerut near Delhi were publicly degraded and imprisoned for refusing to use the cartridges. On the following day, their comrades mutinied: they released the prisoners, killed their British officers and other Europeans, and then set off for Delhi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Course ==&lt;br /&gt;
The mutineers seized Delhi and proclaimed Bahādur Shāh II, the disempowered last Mughal Emperor, their leader. The rebellion spread rapidly throughout northern and central India. In some regions, military mutinies were accompanied by civil uprisings that involved almost all sections of the population. However, most of the Indian princes stayed aloof from the hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In British representations of the uprising, two events in particular were emphasized, both of which concerned the suffering of British civilians at the hands of Indian insurgents: the murder of 200 British women and children in Cawnpore and the five-month siege of the provincial capital of Lucknow by rebel forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, Indians came to remember the British campaign of retaliation as &#039;the Devil&#039;s Wind&#039;. Native villages were razed to the ground; Indian civilians and fighters were tortured, summarily hanged or bound to the mouths of canons which would blow their bodies to pieces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After more than a year of fighting, the British succeeded in suppressing the rebellion, and peace was officially declared on 8th July 1858, although guerrilla warfare went on for some time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The major political results of the uprising were the dissolution of the EIC and the transfer of its powers and territories to the British Crown. In 1858, India was turned into an &#039;official&#039; colony ruled by a British viceroy. Queen Victoria was proclaimed &#039;Empress of India&#039; at the &#039;&#039;Imperial Durbar&#039;&#039; of 1877. The subcontinent, often called Britain&#039;s &#039;jewel in the crown&#039;, became a very profitable part of the Empire in economic terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually, British collective memory transformed the uprising into a Social Darwinist &#039;myth&#039;, in which the British victory seemed to prove that they were the &#039;fitter’ race. This feeling of racial superiority was to serve as the new legitimation of British rule. Disappointed at the perceived ingratitude of the Indians, the British now increasingly saw them as uneducable and unfit for self-government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning. “Der indische Aufstand (&#039;&#039;Indian Mutiny&#039;&#039;) (1857).“ &#039;&#039;Handbuch der britischen Kulturgeschichte. Daten, Fakten, Hintergründe von der römischen Eroberung bis zur Gegenwart.&#039;&#039; Ed. Rudolf Beck and Konrad Schöder. Paderborn: Fink, 2006. 301-307.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judd, Denis. &#039;&#039;Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present.&#039;&#039; London: &lt;br /&gt;
HarperCollins, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kuah, Desmond. “The Epic of Race: The Indian Mutiny, 1857.” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/epic.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landow, George P. “The 1857 Indian Mutiny (Also Known as the Sepoy Rebellion, the Great Mutiny, and the Revolt of 1857).” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/1857.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porter, Bernhard. &#039;&#039;The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1995.&#039;&#039; 3rd ed. London: Longman, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothermund, Dietmar. &#039;&#039;Geschichte Indiens: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart&#039;&#039;. 2nd, rev. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streets, Heather. “Indian War.” &#039;&#039;Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World.&#039;&#039; Ed. Peter N. &lt;br /&gt;
Stearns. Oxford University Press 2008. 24 April 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-modernworld.com/entry?entry=t254.e750&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, A.N. &#039;&#039;The Victorians.&#039;&#039; New York: Norton, 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Talk:Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5638</id>
		<title>Talk:Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Talk:Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5638"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T18:16:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: Created page with &amp;#039;In case anybody is still wondering about the cartridges connected with the &amp;#039;Indian Mutiny&amp;#039;/ Indian Uprising:  &amp;quot;The powder was supplied in pre-measured &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;paper cartridges&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that…&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In case anybody is still wondering about the cartridges connected with the &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039;/ Indian Uprising:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The powder was supplied in pre-measured &#039;&#039;&#039;paper cartridges&#039;&#039;&#039; that were &#039;&#039;&#039;greased to make them waterproof.&#039;&#039;&#039; To load the gun, the soldier was to &#039;&#039;&#039;bite off the end of the cartridge and pour the powder into the muzzle.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot; (Daniel R. Headrick. &#039;&#039;Power over Peoples: Technology, Environments, and Western Imperialism, 1400 to the Present.&#039;&#039; Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton UP, 2009. 260.) .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tearing the coated paper by hand would also have been possible - and indeed was later allowed - but opening the cartridge with your teeth was quicker and left one hand free, things which were important in a war.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5605</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5605"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T02:39:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narrative starting with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (&amp;quot;The Murders in the Rue Morgue&amp;quot;, 1841). However, several British writers also played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police -  nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it discussed broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of Dickens (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the 19th-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, [[Charles Dickens]] wrote a series of non-fictional articles for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039;, praising the work of London police (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, he applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In his detective stories, Conan Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that the author famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conan Doyle&#039;s stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. “Sherlock”, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5604</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5604"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T02:33:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narrative starting with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (&amp;quot;The Murders in the Rue Morgue&amp;quot;, 1841). However, several British writers also played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police -  nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it discussed broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of Dickens (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the 19th-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, [[Charles Dickens]] wrote a series of non-fictional articles for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039;, praising the work of London police (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, he applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In these detective stories, Conan Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that the author famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conan Doyle&#039;s stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. “Sherlock”, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5603</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5603"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T02:32:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narrative starting with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (&amp;quot;The Murders in the Rue Morgue&amp;quot;, 1841). However, several British writers also played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police -  nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it discussed broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of Dickens (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the nineteenth-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, [[Charles Dickens]] wrote a series of non-fictional articles for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039;, praising the work of London police (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, he applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In these detective stories, Conan Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that the author famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conan Doyle&#039;s stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. “Sherlock”, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5602</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5602"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T02:30:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narrative starting with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (&amp;quot;The Murders in the Rue Morgue&amp;quot;, 1841). However, several British writers also played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police -  nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it discussed broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of Dickens (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the nineteenth-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, [[Charles Dickens]] wrote a series of non-fictional articles for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039;, praising the work of London police (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, he applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In these detective stories, Conan Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that the author famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conan Doyle&#039;s stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. “Sherlock”, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5601</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5601"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T02:11:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narrative starting with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (&amp;quot;The Murders in the Rue Morgue&amp;quot;, 1841). However, several British writers also played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police -  nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it discussed broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of Dickens (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the nineteenth-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, [[Charles Dickens]] wrote a series of non-fictional articles for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039;, praising the work of London police (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, Holmes applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In these detective stories, Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that Doyle famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sherlock Holmes stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. “Sherlock”, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5600</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5600"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T02:11:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narrative starting with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (&amp;quot;The Murders in the Rue Morgue&amp;quot;, 1841). However, several British writers played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police -  nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it discussed broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of Dickens (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the nineteenth-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, [[Charles Dickens]] wrote a series of non-fictional articles for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039;, praising the work of London police (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, Holmes applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In these detective stories, Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that Doyle famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sherlock Holmes stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. “Sherlock”, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5599</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5599"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T02:08:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narration beginning with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (&amp;quot;The Murders in the Rue Morgue&amp;quot;, 1841). However, several British writers played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police -  nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it discussed broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of Dickens (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the nineteenth-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, [[Charles Dickens]] wrote a series of non-fictional articles for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039;, praising the work of London police (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, Holmes applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In these detective stories, Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that Doyle famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sherlock Holmes stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. “Sherlock”, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5598</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5598"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T02:05:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narration beginning with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (The Murders in the Rue Morgue, 1841). However, several British writers played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police -  nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it discussed broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of Dickens (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the nineteenth-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, [[Charles Dickens]] wrote a series of non-fictional articles for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039;, praising the work of London police (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, Holmes applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In these detective stories, Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that Doyle famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sherlock Holmes stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. “Sherlock”, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5597</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5597"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T02:03:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narration beginning with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (The Murders in the Rue Morgue, 1841). However, several British writers played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police –    &lt;br /&gt;
 nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it discussed broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of Dickens (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the nineteenth-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, [[Charles Dickens]] wrote a series of non-fictional articles for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039;, praising the work of London police (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, Holmes applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In these detective stories, Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that Doyle famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sherlock Holmes stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. “Sherlock”, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5596</id>
		<title>Victorian Detective Fiction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Victorian_Detective_Fiction&amp;diff=5596"/>
		<updated>2010-11-02T02:00:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: Created page with &amp;#039;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.  == Overview == Crime and its detection have long bee…&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Literary genre that emerged in the 19th century and focuses on the detection of a crime by a professional or amateur sleuth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Crime and its detection have long been a subject matter of world literature and can be found even in the apocryphal stories of the Bible (e.g. Daniel 13). Nevertheless, detective fiction in a narrower sense was a product of the 19th century. Characteristic elements of the genre are a suspenseful narration beginning with an unsolved crime, clues, ‘red herrings’, and the investigation and ultimate solution of the mystery by a detective. More precise definitions of detective fiction vary greatly since it shares many features with related genres.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American author Edgar Allan Poe is generally credited with having written the first modern detective story (The Murders in the Rue Morgue, 1841). However, several British writers played a decisive part in the development of the genre: [[Charles Dickens]], Wilkie Collins and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors contributed to the emergence of Victorian detective fiction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the establishment of a professional police force: a centralized Metropolitan police –nicknamed ‘Bobbies’ after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel – in 1829 and a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1843&lt;br /&gt;
* a growing public interest in matters of law enforcement and criminal prosecution &lt;br /&gt;
* the development of scientific methods of detection (Bertillon System, 1882)&lt;br /&gt;
* rationalism (regarding the analytic methods of the detective) and/or romanticism (regarding the ‘mystery’ to be solved) &lt;br /&gt;
* the emergence of affordable mass media, particularly magazines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caroline Reitz argues that 19th-century detective fiction also answered to feelings of insecurity and that it discussed broader social issues: “the detective use[s] observation and deduction to grapple with the challenges of modernity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins ==&lt;br /&gt;
The works of Dickens (1812-1870) und Collins (1824-1889) mark the transition between two genres by integrating a detective mystery into the nineteenth-century ‘sensation novel’. Both authors were inspired by real-life police inspectors and well-publicised crimes (the Manning and the Constance Kent case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1850 and 1856, Charles Dickens wrote a series of non-fictional articles for his magazine &#039;&#039;Household Words&#039;&#039;, praising the work of London police (“On Duty with Inspector Fields”, “The Detective Police”). In 1852/53, he published the &#039;&#039;Bleak House&#039;&#039;, the first English novel with a police inspector as one of its main characters. Dickens’s last novel &#039;&#039;The Mystery of Edwin Drood&#039;&#039; (1870), which deals with the strange disappearance of its eponymous hero, remained unfinished and thus left the readers with an eternal puzzle to solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two novels by Dickens’s close friend Wilkie Collins also played an important role in the development of detective fiction: &#039;&#039;The Woman in White&#039;&#039; (1859/60), and particularly &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; (1868). The story of &#039;&#039;The Moonstone&#039;&#039; is told by several of the characters and deals with the theft and recovery of a mysterious Indian diamond. Although the crime is not solved by the detective but through a medical experiment, the novel already contained many elements of later detective stories: “a secluded country-house […]; a dinner-party ending in the theft of the diamond, putting the whole household under suspicion; […] a series of false trails followed by the least expected of denouements” (Gilmour 115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) invented the two most famous protagonists of detective fiction: the brilliant and eccentric private detective Sherlock Holmes and his naïve sidekick and chronicler Dr Watson. Sherlock Holmes made his debut in the novel &#039;&#039;A Study in Scarlet&#039;&#039; (1887). Until 1927, Holmes applied his forensic skills and ‘science of deduction’ in three further novels and 56 short stories, many of which were published in serial form in the &#039;&#039;Strand Magazine&#039;&#039;. In these detective stories, Doyle takes up and enlarges the narrative pattern introduced by E.A. Poe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in their own time, the Sherlock Holmes stories became a tremendous success. So much so that Doyle famously tried to rid himself of his detective by having him drown in the Swiss Reichenbach Falls in “The Final Problem” (1893). However, protests by outraged readers and financial considerations led to the resurrection of Sherlock Holmes in the story of “The Empty House” (1903). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sherlock Holmes stories left their mark on the entire genre: they influenced numerous later authors of detective stories, were imitated in pastiches or updated by setting them in the present (e.g. “Sherlock”, BBC mini series, 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmour, Robin. &#039;&#039;The Novel in the Victorian Age: A Modern Introduction&#039;&#039;. London: Arnold, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nayder, Lilian. “Victorian Detective Fiction.” &#039;&#039;A Companion to the Victorian Novel&#039;&#039;. Ed. William Baker and Kenneth Womack. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2002. 178-187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nusser, Peter. &#039;&#039;Der Kriminalroman&#039;&#039;. 4th rev. and enl. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reitz, Caroline. &amp;quot;Detective Fiction.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature&#039;&#039;. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Oxford: OUP, 2005. Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. 20 October 2010 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-britishliterature.com/entry?entry=t198.e0134&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, Mirko F. “Detektivroman.” &#039;&#039;Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen&#039;&#039;. Ed. Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender and Burkhard Moenninghoff. 3rd rev. ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007. 146.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5595</id>
		<title>Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5595"/>
		<updated>2010-11-01T13:33:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1857-58. Unsuccessful rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebellion, India became a British crown colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
Still widely used, the term &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; is increasingly regarded as problematic as it does not account for the involvement of Indian civilians in the rebellion. Suggestions for alternate terms include the &#039;Uprising of 1857&#039; and &#039;Indian War&#039;. Indian nationalist historians have dubbed the uprising the first &#039;Indian War of Independence&#039;, a term in turn disputed by western scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Causes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The outbreak of the rebellion was preceded by mounting discontent with British rule among various sections of the Indian population. Contributing factors were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the increased Christian missionary activity&lt;br /&gt;
* drastic social and economic reforms intended to &#039;anglicise&#039; India&lt;br /&gt;
* further territorial annexations by the EIC (the Punjab in 1848 and Oudh in 1856)&lt;br /&gt;
* the reduction of pensions paid to displaced native rulers&lt;br /&gt;
* the decline in the wages for Indian mercenaries and the cultural insensitivity of their British officers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trigger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The British EIC, which had risen from a private commercial venture to paramount territorial power in India in the 18th century, had equipped its troops with a new weapon – the Enfield rifle. In order to load it, the soldiers had to bite off the ends of greased cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon rumours were circulating among the EIC&#039;s Indian mercenaries (&#039;&#039;sepoys&#039;&#039;) that the grease used for the cartridges consisted of a mixture of pork and beef fat. Using them would thus have resulted in a serious breach of religious laws for both Hindu and Muslim sepoys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 9th May 1857, 85 sepoys stationed in Meerut near Delhi were publicly degraded and imprisoned for refusing to use the cartridges. On the following day, their comrades mutinied: they released the prisoners, killed their British officers and other Europeans, and then set off for Delhi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Course ==&lt;br /&gt;
The mutineers seized Delhi and proclaimed Bahādur Shāh II, the disempowered last Mughal Emperor, their leader. The rebellion spread rapidly throughout northern and central India. In some regions, military mutinies were accompanied by civil uprisings that involved almost all sections of the population. However, most of the Indian princes stayed aloof from the hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In British representations of the uprising, two events in particular were emphasized, both of which concerned the suffering of British civilians at the hands of Indian insurgents: the murder of 200 British women and children in Cawnpore and the five-month siege of the provincial capital of Lucknow by rebel forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, Indians came to remember the British campaign of retaliation as &#039;the Devil&#039;s Wind&#039;. Native villages were razed to the ground; Indian civilians and fighters were tortured, summarily hanged or bound to the mouths of canons which would blow their bodies to pieces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After more than a year of fighting, the British succeeded in suppressing the rebellion, and peace was officially declared on 8th July 1858, although guerrilla warfare went on for some time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The major political results of the uprising were the dissolution of the EIC and the transfer of its powers and territories to the British Crown. In 1858, India was turned into an &#039;official&#039; colony ruled by a British viceroy. Queen Victoria was proclaimed &#039;Empress of India&#039; in 1877. The subcontinent, often called Britain&#039;s &#039;jewel in the crown&#039;, became a very profitable part of the Empire in economic terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually, British collective memory transformed the uprising into a Social Darwinist &#039;myth&#039;, in which the British victory seemed to prove that they were the &#039;fitter’ race. This feeling of racial superiority was to serve as the new legitimation of British rule. Disappointed at the perceived ingratitude of the Indians, the British now increasingly saw them as uneducable and unfit for self-government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning. “Der indische Aufstand (&#039;&#039;Indian Mutiny&#039;&#039;) (1857).“ &#039;&#039;Handbuch der britischen Kulturgeschichte. Daten, Fakten, Hintergründe von der römischen Eroberung bis zur Gegenwart.&#039;&#039; Ed. Rudolf Beck and Konrad Schöder. Paderborn: Fink, 2006. 301-307.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judd, Denis. &#039;&#039;Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present.&#039;&#039; London: &lt;br /&gt;
HarperCollins, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kuah, Desmond. “The Epic of Race: The Indian Mutiny, 1857.” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/epic.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landow, George P. “The 1857 Indian Mutiny (Also Known as the Sepoy Rebellion, the Great Mutiny, and the Revolt of 1857).” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/1857.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porter, Bernhard. &#039;&#039;The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1995.&#039;&#039; 3rd ed. London: Longman, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothermund, Dietmar. &#039;&#039;Geschichte Indiens: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart&#039;&#039;. 2nd, rev. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streets, Heather. “Indian War.” &#039;&#039;Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World.&#039;&#039; Ed. Peter N. &lt;br /&gt;
Stearns. Oxford University Press 2008. 24 April 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-modernworld.com/entry?entry=t254.e750&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, A.N. &#039;&#039;The Victorians.&#039;&#039; New York: Norton, 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5592</id>
		<title>Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5592"/>
		<updated>2010-10-31T23:08:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: /* Causes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; (1857-58) was a rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebellion, India was turned into a British crown colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
Still widely used, the term &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; is increasingly regarded as problematic as it does not account for the involvement of Indian civilians in the rebellion. Suggestions for alternate terms include the &#039;Uprising of 1857&#039; and &#039;Indian War&#039;. Indian nationalist historians have dubbed the uprising the first &#039;Indian War of Independence&#039;, a term in turn disputed by western scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Causes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The outbreak of the rebellion was preceded by mounting discontent with British rule among various sections of the Indian population. Contributing factors were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the increased Christian missionary activity&lt;br /&gt;
* drastic social and economic reforms intended to &#039;anglicise&#039; India&lt;br /&gt;
* further territorial annexations by the EIC (the Punjab in 1848 and Oudh in 1856)&lt;br /&gt;
* the reduction of pensions paid to displaced native rulers&lt;br /&gt;
* the decline in the wages for Indian mercenaries and the cultural insensitivity of their British officers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trigger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The British EIC, which had risen from a private commercial venture to paramount territorial power in India in the 18th century, had equipped its troops with a new weapon – the Enfield rifle. In order to load it, the soldiers had to bite off the ends of greased cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon rumours were circulating among the EIC&#039;s Indian mercenaries (&#039;&#039;sepoys&#039;&#039;) that the grease used for the cartridges consisted of a mixture of pork and beef fat. Using them would thus have resulted in a serious breach of religious laws for both Hindu and Muslim sepoys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 9th May 1857, 85 sepoys stationed in Meerut near Delhi were publicly degraded and imprisoned for refusing to use the cartridges. On the following day, their comrades mutinied: they released the prisoners, killed their British officers and other Europeans, and then set off for Delhi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Course ==&lt;br /&gt;
The mutineers seized Delhi and proclaimed Bahādur Shāh II, the disempowered last Mughal Emperor, their leader. The rebellion spread rapidly throughout northern and central India. In some regions, military mutinies were accompanied by civil uprisings that involved almost all sections of the population. However, most of the Indian princes stayed aloof from the hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In British representations of the uprising, two events in particular were emphasized, both of which concerned the suffering of British civilians at the hands of Indian insurgents: the murder of 200 British women and children in Cawnpore and the five-month siege of the provincial capital of Lucknow by rebel forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, Indians came to remember the British campaign of retaliation as &#039;the Devil&#039;s Wind&#039;. Native villages were razed to the ground; Indian civilians and fighters were tortured, summarily hanged or bound to the mouths of canons which would blow their bodies to pieces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After more than a year of fighting, the British succeeded in suppressing the rebellion, and peace was officially declared on 8th July 1858, although guerrilla warfare went on for some time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The major political results of the uprising were the dissolution of the EIC and the transfer of its powers and territories to the British Crown. In 1858, India was turned into an &#039;official&#039; colony ruled by a British viceroy. Queen Victoria was proclaimed &#039;Empress of India&#039; in 1877. The subcontinent, often called Britain&#039;s &#039;jewel in the crown&#039;, became a very profitable part of the Empire in economic terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually, British collective memory transformed the uprising into a Social Darwinist &#039;myth&#039;, in which the British victory seemed to prove that they were the &#039;fitter’ race. This feeling of racial superiority was to serve as the new legitimation of British rule. Disappointed at the perceived ingratitude of the Indians, the British now increasingly saw them as uneducable and unfit for self-government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning. “Der indische Aufstand (&#039;&#039;Indian Mutiny&#039;&#039;) (1857).“ &#039;&#039;Handbuch der britischen Kulturgeschichte. Daten, Fakten, Hintergründe von der römischen Eroberung bis zur Gegenwart.&#039;&#039; Ed. Rudolf Beck and Konrad Schöder. Paderborn: Fink, 2006. 301-307.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judd, Denis. &#039;&#039;Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present.&#039;&#039; London: &lt;br /&gt;
HarperCollins, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kuah, Desmond. “The Epic of Race: The Indian Mutiny, 1857.” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/epic.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landow, George P. “The 1857 Indian Mutiny (Also Known as the Sepoy Rebellion, the Great Mutiny, and the Revolt of 1857).” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/1857.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porter, Bernhard. &#039;&#039;The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1995.&#039;&#039; 3rd ed. London: Longman, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothermund, Dietmar. &#039;&#039;Geschichte Indiens: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart&#039;&#039;. 2nd, rev. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streets, Heather. “Indian War.” &#039;&#039;Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World.&#039;&#039; Ed. Peter N. &lt;br /&gt;
Stearns. Oxford University Press 2008. 24 April 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-modernworld.com/entry?entry=t254.e750&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, A.N. &#039;&#039;The Victorians.&#039;&#039; New York: Norton, 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5591</id>
		<title>Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5591"/>
		<updated>2010-10-31T23:06:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: /* Causes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; (1857-58) was a rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebellion, India was turned into a British crown colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
Still widely used, the term &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; is increasingly regarded as problematic as it does not account for the involvement of Indian civilians in the rebellion. Suggestions for alternate terms include the &#039;Uprising of 1857&#039; and &#039;Indian War&#039;. Indian nationalist historians have dubbed the uprising the first &#039;Indian War of Independence&#039;, a term in turn disputed by western scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Causes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The outbreak of the rebellion was preceded by mounting discontent with British rule among various sections of the Indian population. Contributing factors were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;•the increased Christian missionary activity&lt;br /&gt;
•drastic social and economic reforms intended to &#039;anglicise&#039; India&lt;br /&gt;
•further territorial annexations by the EIC (the Punjab in 1848 and Oudh in 1856)&lt;br /&gt;
•the reduction of pensions paid to displaced native rulers&lt;br /&gt;
•the decline in the wages for Indian mercenaries and the cultural insensitivity of their British officers&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trigger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The British EIC, which had risen from a private commercial venture to paramount territorial power in India in the 18th century, had equipped its troops with a new weapon – the Enfield rifle. In order to load it, the soldiers had to bite off the ends of greased cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon rumours were circulating among the EIC&#039;s Indian mercenaries (&#039;&#039;sepoys&#039;&#039;) that the grease used for the cartridges consisted of a mixture of pork and beef fat. Using them would thus have resulted in a serious breach of religious laws for both Hindu and Muslim sepoys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 9th May 1857, 85 sepoys stationed in Meerut near Delhi were publicly degraded and imprisoned for refusing to use the cartridges. On the following day, their comrades mutinied: they released the prisoners, killed their British officers and other Europeans, and then set off for Delhi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Course ==&lt;br /&gt;
The mutineers seized Delhi and proclaimed Bahādur Shāh II, the disempowered last Mughal Emperor, their leader. The rebellion spread rapidly throughout northern and central India. In some regions, military mutinies were accompanied by civil uprisings that involved almost all sections of the population. However, most of the Indian princes stayed aloof from the hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In British representations of the uprising, two events in particular were emphasized, both of which concerned the suffering of British civilians at the hands of Indian insurgents: the murder of 200 British women and children in Cawnpore and the five-month siege of the provincial capital of Lucknow by rebel forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, Indians came to remember the British campaign of retaliation as &#039;the Devil&#039;s Wind&#039;. Native villages were razed to the ground; Indian civilians and fighters were tortured, summarily hanged or bound to the mouths of canons which would blow their bodies to pieces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After more than a year of fighting, the British succeeded in suppressing the rebellion, and peace was officially declared on 8th July 1858, although guerrilla warfare went on for some time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The major political results of the uprising were the dissolution of the EIC and the transfer of its powers and territories to the British Crown. In 1858, India was turned into an &#039;official&#039; colony ruled by a British viceroy. Queen Victoria was proclaimed &#039;Empress of India&#039; in 1877. The subcontinent, often called Britain&#039;s &#039;jewel in the crown&#039;, became a very profitable part of the Empire in economic terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually, British collective memory transformed the uprising into a Social Darwinist &#039;myth&#039;, in which the British victory seemed to prove that they were the &#039;fitter’ race. This feeling of racial superiority was to serve as the new legitimation of British rule. Disappointed at the perceived ingratitude of the Indians, the British now increasingly saw them as uneducable and unfit for self-government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning. “Der indische Aufstand (&#039;&#039;Indian Mutiny&#039;&#039;) (1857).“ &#039;&#039;Handbuch der britischen Kulturgeschichte. Daten, Fakten, Hintergründe von der römischen Eroberung bis zur Gegenwart.&#039;&#039; Ed. Rudolf Beck and Konrad Schöder. Paderborn: Fink, 2006. 301-307.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judd, Denis. &#039;&#039;Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present.&#039;&#039; London: &lt;br /&gt;
HarperCollins, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kuah, Desmond. “The Epic of Race: The Indian Mutiny, 1857.” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/epic.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landow, George P. “The 1857 Indian Mutiny (Also Known as the Sepoy Rebellion, the Great Mutiny, and the Revolt of 1857).” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/1857.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porter, Bernhard. &#039;&#039;The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1995.&#039;&#039; 3rd ed. London: Longman, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothermund, Dietmar. &#039;&#039;Geschichte Indiens: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart&#039;&#039;. 2nd, rev. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streets, Heather. “Indian War.” &#039;&#039;Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World.&#039;&#039; Ed. Peter N. &lt;br /&gt;
Stearns. Oxford University Press 2008. 24 April 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-modernworld.com/entry?entry=t254.e750&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, A.N. &#039;&#039;The Victorians.&#039;&#039; New York: Norton, 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5590</id>
		<title>Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5590"/>
		<updated>2010-10-31T23:00:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: /* Literature */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; (1857-58) was a rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebellion, India was turned into a British crown colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
Still widely used, the term &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; is increasingly regarded as problematic as it does not account for the involvement of Indian civilians in the rebellion. Suggestions for alternate terms include the &#039;Uprising of 1857&#039; and &#039;Indian War&#039;. Indian nationalist historians have dubbed the uprising the first &#039;Indian War of Independence&#039;, a term in turn disputed by western scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Causes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The outbreak of the rebellion was preceded by mounting discontent with British rule among various sections of the Indian population. Contributing factors were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•the increased Christian missionary activity&lt;br /&gt;
•drastic social and economic reforms intended to &#039;anglicise&#039; India&lt;br /&gt;
•further territorial annexations by the EIC (the Punjab in 1848 and Oudh in 1856)&lt;br /&gt;
•the reduction of pensions paid to displaced native rulers&lt;br /&gt;
•the decline in the wages for Indian mercenaries and the cultural insensitivity of their British officers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trigger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The British EIC, which had risen from a private commercial venture to paramount territorial power in India in the 18th century, had equipped its troops with a new weapon – the Enfield rifle. In order to load it, the soldiers had to bite off the ends of greased cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon rumours were circulating among the EIC&#039;s Indian mercenaries (&#039;&#039;sepoys&#039;&#039;) that the grease used for the cartridges consisted of a mixture of pork and beef fat. Using them would thus have resulted in a serious breach of religious laws for both Hindu and Muslim sepoys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 9th May 1857, 85 sepoys stationed in Meerut near Delhi were publicly degraded and imprisoned for refusing to use the cartridges. On the following day, their comrades mutinied: they released the prisoners, killed their British officers and other Europeans, and then set off for Delhi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Course ==&lt;br /&gt;
The mutineers seized Delhi and proclaimed Bahādur Shāh II, the disempowered last Mughal Emperor, their leader. The rebellion spread rapidly throughout northern and central India. In some regions, military mutinies were accompanied by civil uprisings that involved almost all sections of the population. However, most of the Indian princes stayed aloof from the hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In British representations of the uprising, two events in particular were emphasized, both of which concerned the suffering of British civilians at the hands of Indian insurgents: the murder of 200 British women and children in Cawnpore and the five-month siege of the provincial capital of Lucknow by rebel forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, Indians came to remember the British campaign of retaliation as &#039;the Devil&#039;s Wind&#039;. Native villages were razed to the ground; Indian civilians and fighters were tortured, summarily hanged or bound to the mouths of canons which would blow their bodies to pieces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After more than a year of fighting, the British succeeded in suppressing the rebellion, and peace was officially declared on 8th July 1858, although guerrilla warfare went on for some time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The major political results of the uprising were the dissolution of the EIC and the transfer of its powers and territories to the British Crown. In 1858, India was turned into an &#039;official&#039; colony ruled by a British viceroy. Queen Victoria was proclaimed &#039;Empress of India&#039; in 1877. The subcontinent, often called Britain&#039;s &#039;jewel in the crown&#039;, became a very profitable part of the Empire in economic terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually, British collective memory transformed the uprising into a Social Darwinist &#039;myth&#039;, in which the British victory seemed to prove that they were the &#039;fitter’ race. This feeling of racial superiority was to serve as the new legitimation of British rule. Disappointed at the perceived ingratitude of the Indians, the British now increasingly saw them as uneducable and unfit for self-government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning. “Der indische Aufstand (&#039;&#039;Indian Mutiny&#039;&#039;) (1857).“ &#039;&#039;Handbuch der britischen Kulturgeschichte. Daten, Fakten, Hintergründe von der römischen Eroberung bis zur Gegenwart.&#039;&#039; Ed. Rudolf Beck and Konrad Schöder. Paderborn: Fink, 2006. 301-307.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judd, Denis. &#039;&#039;Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present.&#039;&#039; London: &lt;br /&gt;
HarperCollins, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kuah, Desmond. “The Epic of Race: The Indian Mutiny, 1857.” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/epic.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landow, George P. “The 1857 Indian Mutiny (Also Known as the Sepoy Rebellion, the Great Mutiny, and the Revolt of 1857).” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/1857.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porter, Bernhard. &#039;&#039;The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1995.&#039;&#039; 3rd ed. London: Longman, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothermund, Dietmar. &#039;&#039;Geschichte Indiens: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart&#039;&#039;. 2nd, rev. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streets, Heather. “Indian War.” &#039;&#039;Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World.&#039;&#039; Ed. Peter N. &lt;br /&gt;
Stearns. Oxford University Press 2008. 24 April 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-modernworld.com/entry?entry=t254.e750&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, A.N. &#039;&#039;The Victorians.&#039;&#039; New York: Norton, 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5589</id>
		<title>Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5589"/>
		<updated>2010-10-31T22:56:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: /* Literature */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; (1857-58) was a rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebellion, India was turned into a British crown colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
Still widely used, the term &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; is increasingly regarded as problematic as it does not account for the involvement of Indian civilians in the rebellion. Suggestions for alternate terms include the &#039;Uprising of 1857&#039; and &#039;Indian War&#039;. Indian nationalist historians have dubbed the uprising the first &#039;Indian War of Independence&#039;, a term in turn disputed by western scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Causes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The outbreak of the rebellion was preceded by mounting discontent with British rule among various sections of the Indian population. Contributing factors were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•the increased Christian missionary activity&lt;br /&gt;
•drastic social and economic reforms intended to &#039;anglicise&#039; India&lt;br /&gt;
•further territorial annexations by the EIC (the Punjab in 1848 and Oudh in 1856)&lt;br /&gt;
•the reduction of pensions paid to displaced native rulers&lt;br /&gt;
•the decline in the wages for Indian mercenaries and the cultural insensitivity of their British officers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trigger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The British EIC, which had risen from a private commercial venture to paramount territorial power in India in the 18th century, had equipped its troops with a new weapon – the Enfield rifle. In order to load it, the soldiers had to bite off the ends of greased cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon rumours were circulating among the EIC&#039;s Indian mercenaries (&#039;&#039;sepoys&#039;&#039;) that the grease used for the cartridges consisted of a mixture of pork and beef fat. Using them would thus have resulted in a serious breach of religious laws for both Hindu and Muslim sepoys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 9th May 1857, 85 sepoys stationed in Meerut near Delhi were publicly degraded and imprisoned for refusing to use the cartridges. On the following day, their comrades mutinied: they released the prisoners, killed their British officers and other Europeans, and then set off for Delhi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Course ==&lt;br /&gt;
The mutineers seized Delhi and proclaimed Bahādur Shāh II, the disempowered last Mughal Emperor, their leader. The rebellion spread rapidly throughout northern and central India. In some regions, military mutinies were accompanied by civil uprisings that involved almost all sections of the population. However, most of the Indian princes stayed aloof from the hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In British representations of the uprising, two events in particular were emphasized, both of which concerned the suffering of British civilians at the hands of Indian insurgents: the murder of 200 British women and children in Cawnpore and the five-month siege of the provincial capital of Lucknow by rebel forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, Indians came to remember the British campaign of retaliation as &#039;the Devil&#039;s Wind&#039;. Native villages were razed to the ground; Indian civilians and fighters were tortured, summarily hanged or bound to the mouths of canons which would blow their bodies to pieces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After more than a year of fighting, the British succeeded in suppressing the rebellion, and peace was officially declared on 8th July 1858, although guerrilla warfare went on for some time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The major political results of the uprising were the dissolution of the EIC and the transfer of its powers and territories to the British Crown. In 1858, India was turned into an &#039;official&#039; colony ruled by a British viceroy. Queen Victoria was proclaimed &#039;Empress of India&#039; in 1877. The subcontinent, often called Britain&#039;s &#039;jewel in the crown&#039;, became a very profitable part of the Empire in economic terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually, British collective memory transformed the uprising into a Social Darwinist &#039;myth&#039;, in which the British victory seemed to prove that they were the &#039;fitter’ race. This feeling of racial superiority was to serve as the new legitimation of British rule. Disappointed at the perceived ingratitude of the Indians, the British now increasingly saw them as uneducable and unfit for self-government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning. “Der indische Aufstand (&#039;&#039;Indian Mutiny&#039;&#039;) (1857).“ &#039;&#039;Handbuch der britischen Kulturgeschichte. Daten, Fakten, Hintergründe von der römischen Eroberung bis zur Gegenwart.&#039;&#039; Ed. Rudolf Beck and Konrad Schöder. Paderborn: Fink, 2006. 301-307.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judd, Denis. &#039;&#039;Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present.&#039;&#039; London: &lt;br /&gt;
HarperCollins, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kuah, Desmond. “The Epic of Race: The Indian Mutiny, 1857.” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/epic.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landow, George P. “The 1857 Indian Mutiny (Also Known as the Sepoy Rebellion, the Great Mutiny, and the Revolt of 1857).” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/1857.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porter, Bernhard. &#039;&#039;The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1995.&#039;&#039; 3rd ed. London: Longman, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothermund, Dietmar. &#039;&#039;Geschichte Indiens: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart&#039;&#039;. 2nd, rev. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streets, Heather. “Indian War.” &#039;&#039;Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World.&#039;&#039; Ed. Peter N. &lt;br /&gt;
Stearns. Oxford University Press 2008. 24 April 2009. &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-modernworld.com/entry?entry=t254.e750&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, A.N. &#039;&#039;The Victorians.&#039;&#039; New York: Norton, 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5588</id>
		<title>Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5588"/>
		<updated>2010-10-31T22:53:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: /* Literature */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; (1857-58) was a rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebellion, India was turned into a British crown colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
Still widely used, the term &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; is increasingly regarded as problematic as it does not account for the involvement of Indian civilians in the rebellion. Suggestions for alternate terms include the &#039;Uprising of 1857&#039; and &#039;Indian War&#039;. Indian nationalist historians have dubbed the uprising the first &#039;Indian War of Independence&#039;, a term in turn disputed by western scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Causes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The outbreak of the rebellion was preceded by mounting discontent with British rule among various sections of the Indian population. Contributing factors were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•the increased Christian missionary activity&lt;br /&gt;
•drastic social and economic reforms intended to &#039;anglicise&#039; India&lt;br /&gt;
•further territorial annexations by the EIC (the Punjab in 1848 and Oudh in 1856)&lt;br /&gt;
•the reduction of pensions paid to displaced native rulers&lt;br /&gt;
•the decline in the wages for Indian mercenaries and the cultural insensitivity of their British officers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trigger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The British EIC, which had risen from a private commercial venture to paramount territorial power in India in the 18th century, had equipped its troops with a new weapon – the Enfield rifle. In order to load it, the soldiers had to bite off the ends of greased cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon rumours were circulating among the EIC&#039;s Indian mercenaries (&#039;&#039;sepoys&#039;&#039;) that the grease used for the cartridges consisted of a mixture of pork and beef fat. Using them would thus have resulted in a serious breach of religious laws for both Hindu and Muslim sepoys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 9th May 1857, 85 sepoys stationed in Meerut near Delhi were publicly degraded and imprisoned for refusing to use the cartridges. On the following day, their comrades mutinied: they released the prisoners, killed their British officers and other Europeans, and then set off for Delhi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Course ==&lt;br /&gt;
The mutineers seized Delhi and proclaimed Bahādur Shāh II, the disempowered last Mughal Emperor, their leader. The rebellion spread rapidly throughout northern and central India. In some regions, military mutinies were accompanied by civil uprisings that involved almost all sections of the population. However, most of the Indian princes stayed aloof from the hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In British representations of the uprising, two events in particular were emphasized, both of which concerned the suffering of British civilians at the hands of Indian insurgents: the murder of 200 British women and children in Cawnpore and the five-month siege of the provincial capital of Lucknow by rebel forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, Indians came to remember the British campaign of retaliation as &#039;the Devil&#039;s Wind&#039;. Native villages were razed to the ground; Indian civilians and fighters were tortured, summarily hanged or bound to the mouths of canons which would blow their bodies to pieces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After more than a year of fighting, the British succeeded in suppressing the rebellion, and peace was officially declared on 8th July 1858, although guerrilla warfare went on for some time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The major political results of the uprising were the dissolution of the EIC and the transfer of its powers and territories to the British Crown. In 1858, India was turned into an &#039;official&#039; colony ruled by a British viceroy. Queen Victoria was proclaimed &#039;Empress of India&#039; in 1877. The subcontinent, often called Britain&#039;s &#039;jewel in the crown&#039;, became a very profitable part of the Empire in economic terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually, British collective memory transformed the uprising into a Social Darwinist &#039;myth&#039;, in which the British victory seemed to prove that they were the &#039;fitter’ race. This feeling of racial superiority was to serve as the new legitimation of British rule. Disappointed at the perceived ingratitude of the Indians, the British now increasingly saw them as uneducable and unfit for self-government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning. “Der indische Aufstand (&#039;&#039;Indian Mutiny&#039;&#039;) (1857).“ &#039;&#039;Handbuch der britischen Kulturgeschichte. Daten, Fakten, Hintergründe von der römischen Eroberung bis zur Gegenwart.&#039;&#039; Ed. Rudolf Beck and Konrad Schöder. Paderborn: Fink, 2006. 301-307.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judd, Denis. &#039;&#039;Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present.&#039;&#039; London: &lt;br /&gt;
HarperCollins, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kuah, Desmond. “The Epic of Race: The Indian Mutiny, 1857.” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/epic.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landow, George P. “The 1857 Indian Mutiny (Also Known as the Sepoy Rebellion, the Great Mutiny, and the Revolt of 1857).” &#039;&#039;The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria.&#039;&#039; George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/1857.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porter, Bernhard. &#039;&#039;The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1995.&#039;&#039; 3rd ed. London: Longman, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothermund, Dietmar. &#039;&#039;Geschichte Indiens: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart&#039;&#039;. 2nd, rev. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streets, Heather. “Indian War.” &#039;&#039;Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World.&#039;&#039; Ed. Peter N. &lt;br /&gt;
Stearns. Oxford University Press 2008. 24 April 2009. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;http://www.oxford-      modernworld.com/entry?entry=t254.e750&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;Wilson, A.N. &#039;&#039;The Victorians.&#039;&#039; New York: Norton, 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5587</id>
		<title>Indian Mutiny</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Indian_Mutiny&amp;diff=5587"/>
		<updated>2010-10-31T22:35:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VanessaPohl: Created page with &amp;#039;The &amp;#039;Indian Mutiny&amp;#039; (1857-58) was a rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebelli…&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; (1857-58) was a rebellion against British rule started by Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company (EIC). After the suppression of the rebellion, India was turned into a British crown colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terminology ==&lt;br /&gt;
Still widely used, the term &#039;Indian Mutiny&#039; is increasingly regarded as problematic as it does not account for the involvement of Indian civilians in the rebellion. Suggestions for alternate terms include the &#039;Uprising of 1857&#039; and &#039;Indian War&#039;. Indian nationalist historians have dubbed the uprising the first &#039;Indian War of Independence&#039;, a term in turn disputed by western scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Causes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The outbreak of the rebellion was preceded by mounting discontent with British rule among various sections of the Indian population. Contributing factors were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•the increased Christian missionary activity&lt;br /&gt;
•drastic social and economic reforms intended to &#039;anglicise&#039; India&lt;br /&gt;
•further territorial annexations by the EIC (the Punjab in 1848 and Oudh in 1856)&lt;br /&gt;
•the reduction of pensions paid to displaced native rulers&lt;br /&gt;
•the decline in the wages for Indian mercenaries and the cultural insensitivity of their British officers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trigger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The British EIC, which had risen from a private commercial venture to paramount territorial power in India in the 18th century, had equipped its troops with a new weapon – the Enfield rifle. In order to load it, the soldiers had to bite off the ends of greased cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon rumours were circulating among the EIC&#039;s Indian mercenaries (&#039;&#039;sepoys&#039;&#039;) that the grease used for the cartridges consisted of a mixture of pork and beef fat. Using them would thus have resulted in a serious breach of religious laws for both Hindu and Muslim sepoys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 9th May 1857, 85 sepoys stationed in Meerut near Delhi were publicly degraded and imprisoned for refusing to use the cartridges. On the following day, their comrades mutinied: they released the prisoners, killed their British officers and other Europeans, and then set off for Delhi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Course ==&lt;br /&gt;
The mutineers seized Delhi and proclaimed Bahādur Shāh II, the disempowered last Mughal Emperor, their leader. The rebellion spread rapidly throughout northern and central India. In some regions, military mutinies were accompanied by civil uprisings that involved almost all sections of the population. However, most of the Indian princes stayed aloof from the hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In British representations of the uprising, two events in particular were emphasized, both of which concerned the suffering of British civilians at the hands of Indian insurgents: the murder of 200 British women and children in Cawnpore and the five-month siege of the provincial capital of Lucknow by rebel forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, Indians came to remember the British campaign of retaliation as &#039;the Devil&#039;s Wind&#039;. Native villages were razed to the ground; Indian civilians and fighters were tortured, summarily hanged or bound to the mouths of canons which would blow their bodies to pieces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After more than a year of fighting, the British succeeded in suppressing the rebellion, and peace was officially declared on 8th July 1858, although guerrilla warfare went on for some time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
The major political results of the uprising were the dissolution of the EIC and the transfer of its powers and territories to the British Crown. In 1858, India was turned into an &#039;official&#039; colony ruled by a British viceroy. Queen Victoria was proclaimed &#039;Empress of India&#039; in 1877. The subcontinent, often called Britain&#039;s &#039;jewel in the crown&#039;, became a very profitable part of the Empire in economic terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gradually, British collective memory transformed the uprising into a Social Darwinist &#039;myth&#039;, in which the British victory seemed to prove that they were the &#039;fitter’ race. This feeling of racial superiority was to serve as the new legitimation of British rule. Disappointed at the perceived ingratitude of the Indians, the British now increasingly saw them as uneducable and unfit for self-government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning. “Der indische Aufstand (Indian Mutiny) (1857).“ Handbuch der britischen Kulturgeschichte. Daten, Fakten, Hintergründe von der römischen Eroberung bis zur Gegenwart. Ed. Rudolf Beck and Konrad Schöder. Paderborn: Fink, 2006. 301-307.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judd, Denis. Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present. London: &lt;br /&gt;
HarperCollins, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kuah, Desmond. “The Epic of Race: The Indian Mutiny, 1857.” The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria. George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/epic.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Landow, George P. “The 1857 Indian Mutiny (Also Known as the Sepoy Rebellion, the Great Mutiny, and the Revolt of 1857).” The Victorian Web: Literature, History &amp;amp; Culture in the Age of Victoria. George P. Landow, et. al., gen. eds. 26 March 2002. 31 August 2009 &amp;lt;http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/1857/1857.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porter, Bernhard. The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1995. 3rd ed. London: Longman, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothermund, Dietmar. Geschichte Indiens: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. 2nd, rev. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streets, Heather. “Indian War.” Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World. Ed. Peter N. &lt;br /&gt;
Stearns. Oxford University Press 2008. 24 April 2009. &amp;lt;http://www.oxford-      modernworld.com/entry?entry=t254.e750&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, A.N. The Victorians. New York: Norton, 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VanessaPohl</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>