Camillagate - Revision history

Pankratz at 08:48, 30 April 2010

2010-04-30T08:48:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 30 April 2010
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Camilla: You are a complete idiot (Laughs) Oh, what a wonderful idea.		Camilla: You are a complete idiot (Laughs) Oh, what a wonderful idea.

	Charles: My luck to be chucked down the lavatory and go on and on forever		Charles: My luck to be chucked down the lavatory and go on and on forever swirling round on the top, never going down.
	swirling round on the top, never going down.

	Camilla: (Laughing) Oh, Darling!		Camilla: (Laughing) Oh, Darling!

Pankratz at 08:47, 30 April 2010

2010-04-30T08:47:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:47, 30 April 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	(...)		(...)

	Charles: Oh. God. I'll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be		Charles: Oh. God. I'll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be much easier!
	much easier!

	Camilla: (laughing) "what are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers?		Camilla: (laughing) "what are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers?
Line 23:		Line 22:
	Both laugh		Both laugh

	Camilla: Oh, You're ~~your~~'e going to come back as a pair of knickers.		Camilla: Oh, You're you're going to come back as a pair of knickers.

	Charles: Or, God forbid a Tampax. Just my luck! (Laughs)		Charles: Or, God forbid a Tampax. Just my luck! (Laughs)

Pankratz at 08:47, 30 April 2010

2010-04-30T08:47:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:47, 30 April 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	At the beginning of 1993, the Australian women's weekly magazine ''New Idea'' first published the transcript of a very sexual and intimate phone conversation between Prince Charles and his then mistress Camilla Parker-Bowles, who was at that time still married to one of Charles' closest friends at that time. Later, the transcripts where also published in the US ''Star'' magazine and in the German ''Bild Zeitung''. It was also released in Dutch and Belgian newspapers. However, British newspapers first hesitated to publish the transcripts since media mogul Rupert Murdoch said that the release of the full transcript would be far too damaging for the monarchy (Marks 1).		At the beginning of 1993, the Australian women's weekly magazine ''New Idea'' first published the transcript of a very sexual and intimate phone conversation between Prince Charles and his then mistress Camilla Parker-Bowles, who was at that time still married to one of Charles' closest friends at that time. Later, the transcripts where also published in the US ''Star'' magazine and in the German ''Bild Zeitung''. It was also released in Dutch and Belgian newspapers. However, British newspapers first hesitated to publish the transcripts since media mogul Rupert Murdoch said that the release of the full transcript would be far too damaging for the monarchy (Marks 1).
	Later, when the transcripts where released in the British press, it turned out that [[Princess Diana]] supported the release actively (Holden 310)		Later, when the transcripts where released in the British press, it turned out that [[Princess Diana]] supported the release actively (Holden 310). Even though the public already expected that Charles and Princess Diana had problems in their marriage, the phone conversation between Charles and Camilla left no doubt that the royal marriage between Charles and Diana was over (ibid. 27).

	Even though the public already expected that Charles and Princess Diana had problems in their marriage, the phone conversation between Charles and Camilla left no doubt that the royal marriage between Charles and Diana was over (ibid. 27).

	The content of the conversation led to many radical reactions; for example, students of the William-and-Mary University initiated a costume party called "Camilla's and Charles' sleepover" for the 300-year-anniversary of the university. Other British women used the term "Charlie" for a tampax (ibid. 265).		The content of the conversation led to many radical reactions; for example, students of the William-and-Mary University initiated a costume party called "Camilla's and Charles' sleepover" for the 300-year-anniversary of the university. Other British women used the term "Charlie" for a tampax (ibid. 265).

	Due to this humiliating scandal, Charles became very depressed and withdrew from public events, while his wife Diana experienced a lot of compassion from the British public (ibid. 325 ff.).		Due to this humiliating scandal, Charles became very depressed and withdrew from public events, while his wife Diana experienced a lot of compassion from the British public (ibid. 325 ff.). The royal establishment, however, was allegedly not that shocked about the affair itself. The true scandal was that Charles was caught cheating and that it could be proven without any doubt (ibid. 312).

	The royal establishment, however, was allegedly not that shocked about the affair itself. The true scandal was that Charles was caught cheating and that it could be proven without any doubt (ibid. 312).

	An excerpt from the conversation:		An excerpt from the conversation:

WallisSimpson at 16:14, 29 April 2010

2010-04-29T16:14:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:14, 29 April 2010
Line 47:		Line 47:


	(For a transcript of the ~~whole~~ conversation please see http://www.textfiles.com/phreak/camilla.txt)		(For a transcript of the full conversation please see http://www.textfiles.com/phreak/camilla.txt)

WallisSimpson at 16:13, 29 April 2010

2010-04-29T16:13:58Z

WallisSimpson at 16:12, 29 April 2010

2010-04-29T16:12:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:12, 29 April 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	The royal establishment, however, was allegedly not that shocked about the affair itself. The true scandal was that Charles was caught cheating and that it could be proven without any doubt (ibid. 312).		The royal establishment, however, was allegedly not that shocked about the affair itself. The true scandal was that Charles was caught cheating and that it could be proven without any doubt (ibid. 312).

			An excerpt from the conversation:

	For a transcript of the conversation please see http://www.textfiles.com/phreak/camilla.txt		Camilla: It's like that programme Start the Week. I can't start the week without you.
			Charles: I fill up your tank!

			(...)

			Charles: Oh. God. I'll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be
			much easier!
			Camilla: (laughing) "what are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers?
			Both laugh
			Camilla: Oh, You're your'e going to come back as a pair of knickers.
			Charles: Or, God forbid a Tampax. Just my luck! (Laughs)
			Camilla: You are a complete idiot (Laughs) Oh, what a wonderful idea.
			Charles: My luck to be chucked down the lavatory and go on and on forever
			swirling round on the top, never going down.
			Camilla: (Laughing) Oh, Darling!
			Charles: Until the next one comes through.
			Camilla: Oh, perhaps you could come back as a box.
			Charles: What sort of box?
			Camilla: A box of Tampax, so you could just keep going.

			(For a transcript of the whole conversation please see http://www.textfiles.com/phreak/camilla.txt)

Pankratz at 14:51, 28 April 2010

2010-04-28T14:51:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 28 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~As 'Camillagate' a~~ scandal ~~is referred~~ to ~~that damaged~~ Prince Charles~~' reputation extensively in the early 90s~~.		A scandal (hence the Suffix "gate", in analogy to "Watergate") of the early 1990s, involving [[Camilla Parker-Bowles]] and [[Prince Charles]].

	At the beginning of 1993, the Australian women's weekly magazine New Idea first published a very sexual and intimate phone conversation between Prince Charles and his mistress Camilla Parker-Bowles, who was still married to one of Charles' closest friends at that time. Later, the transcripts where also published in the US Star magazine and in the German Bild Zeitung. It was also released in Dutch and Belgian newspapers. However, British newspapers first hesitated to publish the transcripts since media mogul Rupert Murdoch said that the release of the full transcript would be far to damaging for the monarchy (Marks 1).		At the beginning of 1993, the Australian women's weekly magazine ''New Idea'' first published the transcript of a very sexual and intimate phone conversation between Prince Charles and his then mistress Camilla Parker-Bowles, who was at that time still married to one of Charles' closest friends at that time. Later, the transcripts where also published in the US ''Star'' magazine and in the German ''Bild Zeitung''. It was also released in Dutch and Belgian newspapers. However, British newspapers first hesitated to publish the transcripts since media mogul Rupert Murdoch said that the release of the full transcript would be far too damaging for the monarchy (Marks 1).
	Later, when the transcripts where released in the British press, it turned out that Princess Diana supported the release actively (Holden 310)		Later, when the transcripts where released in the British press, it turned out that [[Princess Diana]] supported the release actively (Holden 310)

	Even though the public already expected that Charles and Princess Diana had problems in their marriage, the phone conversation between Charles and Camilla left no doubt that the royal marriage between Charles and Diana was over (ibid. 27).		Even though the public already expected that Charles and Princess Diana had problems in their marriage, the phone conversation between Charles and Camilla left no doubt that the royal marriage between Charles and Diana was over (ibid. 27).

	The content of the conversation led to many radical reactions; for example, students of the William-and-Mary University initiated a costume party called ~~“Camilla~~'s and Charles' ~~sleepover”~~ for the 300-year-anniversary of the university. Other British women used the term ~~“Charlie”~~ for a tampax (ibid. 265).		The content of the conversation led to many radical reactions; for example, students of the William-and-Mary University initiated a costume party called "Camilla's and Charles' sleepover" for the 300-year-anniversary of the university. Other British women used the term "Charlie" for a tampax (ibid. 265).

	Due to this humiliating scandal, Charles became very depressed and withdrew ~~himself~~ from public events, while his wife Diana experienced a lot of compassion from the British public (ibid. 325 ff.).		Due to this humiliating scandal, Charles became very depressed and withdrew from public events, while his wife Diana experienced a lot of compassion from the British public (ibid. 325 ff.).

	The royal establishment, however, was allegedly not that shocked about the affair itself. The true scandal was that Charles was caught cheating and that it could be proven without any doubt (ibid. 312).		The royal establishment, however, was allegedly not that shocked about the affair itself. The true scandal was that Charles was caught cheating and that it could be proven without any doubt (ibid. 312).
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Sources:		Sources:

	Holden, Anthony. Der wankende Thron. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe, 1994.		Holden, Anthony. ''Der wankende Thron''. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe, 1994.

	Marks, Kathy. ~~“Global~~ audience for Camillagate script.” The Independent. 27th April 2010		Marks, Kathy. "Global audience for Camillagate script." The Independent. 27th April 2010
	<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/global-audience-for-camillagate-script-1478405.html>.		<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/global-audience-for-camillagate-script-1478405.html>.

WallisSimpson: Created page with 'As 'Camillagate' a scandal is referred to that damaged Prince Charles' reputation extensively in the early 90s. At the beginning of 1993, the Australian women's weekly magazine …'

2010-04-27T18:24:11Z

Created page with 'As 'Camillagate' a scandal is referred to that damaged Prince Charles' reputation extensively in the early 90s. At the beginning of 1993, the Australian women's weekly magazine …'

New page

As 'Camillagate' a scandal is referred to that damaged Prince Charles' reputation extensively in the early 90s.

At the beginning of 1993, the Australian women's weekly magazine New Idea first published a very sexual and intimate phone conversation between Prince Charles and his mistress Camilla Parker-Bowles, who was still married to one of Charles' closest friends at that time. Later, the transcripts where also published in the US Star magazine and in the German Bild Zeitung. It was also released in Dutch and Belgian newspapers. However, British newspapers first hesitated to publish the transcripts since media mogul Rupert Murdoch said that the release of the full transcript would be far to damaging for the monarchy (Marks 1).
Later, when the transcripts where released in the British press, it turned out that Princess Diana supported the release actively (Holden 310)

Even though the public already expected that Charles and Princess Diana had problems in their marriage, the phone conversation between Charles and Camilla left no doubt that the royal marriage between Charles and Diana was over (ibid. 27).

The content of the conversation led to many radical reactions; for example, students of the William-and-Mary University initiated a costume party called “Camilla's and Charles' sleepover” for the 300-year-anniversary of the university. Other British women used the term “Charlie” for a tampax (ibid. 265).

Due to this humiliating scandal, Charles became very depressed and withdrew himself from public events, while his wife Diana experienced a lot of compassion from the British public (ibid. 325 ff.).

The royal establishment, however, was allegedly not that shocked about the affair itself. The true scandal was that Charles was caught cheating and that it could be proven without any doubt (ibid. 312).

For a transcript of the conversation please see http://www.textfiles.com/phreak/camilla.txt

Sources:

Holden, Anthony. Der wankende Thron. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe, 1994.

Marks, Kathy. “Global audience for Camillagate script.” The Independent. 27th April 2010
<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/global-audience-for-camillagate-script-1478405.html>.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 29 April 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Camilla: It's like that programme Start the Week. I can't start the week without you.		Camilla: It's like that programme Start the Week. I can't start the week without you.

	Charles: I fill up your tank!		Charles: I fill up your tank!

Line 21:		Line 22:
	Charles: Oh. God. I'll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be		Charles: Oh. God. I'll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be
	much easier!		much easier!

	Camilla: (laughing) "what are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers?		Camilla: (laughing) "what are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers?

	Both laugh		Both laugh

	Camilla: Oh, You're your'e going to come back as a pair of knickers.		Camilla: Oh, You're your'e going to come back as a pair of knickers.

	Charles: Or, God forbid a Tampax. Just my luck! (Laughs)		Charles: Or, God forbid a Tampax. Just my luck! (Laughs)

	Camilla: You are a complete idiot (Laughs) Oh, what a wonderful idea.		Camilla: You are a complete idiot (Laughs) Oh, what a wonderful idea.

	Charles: My luck to be chucked down the lavatory and go on and on forever		Charles: My luck to be chucked down the lavatory and go on and on forever
	swirling round on the top, never going down.		swirling round on the top, never going down.

	Camilla: (Laughing) Oh, Darling!		Camilla: (Laughing) Oh, Darling!

	Charles: Until the next one comes through.		Charles: Until the next one comes through.

	Camilla: Oh, perhaps you could come back as a box.		Camilla: Oh, perhaps you could come back as a box.

	Charles: What sort of box?		Charles: What sort of box?

	Camilla: A box of Tampax, so you could just keep going.		Camilla: A box of Tampax, so you could just keep going.


	(For a transcript of the whole conversation please see http://www.textfiles.com/phreak/camilla.txt)		(For a transcript of the whole conversation please see http://www.textfiles.com/phreak/camilla.txt)