Great Chain of Being - Revision history

WikiSysop: /* Sources: */

2018-01-24T10:55:20Z

Sources:

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:55, 24 January 2018
Line 31:		Line 31:
	==Sources:==		==Sources:==

	~~http://academic~~.~~brooklyn~~.~~cuny~~.~~edu/english/melani/cs6/ren~~.~~html~~		Lovejoy, Arthur O. ''The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea''. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.

	~~Lovejoy, Arthur O~~. ''~~The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the history of an idea''. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.~~		“Renaissance.” ''A Guide to the Study of Literature: A Companion Text for Core Studies 6, Landmarks of Literature.'' 23 Sept. 2001. Dept. of English, Brooklyn College, http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/ren.html. Accessed 10 July 2010.

	~~“Renaissance.”~~ A Guide to the Study of Literature: A Companion Text for Core Studies 6, Landmarks of Literature. 23 Sept. 2001. Dept. of English, Brooklyn College, ~~10 July 2010.~~ http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/ren.html.

	Tillyard, E.M.W. ''The Elizabethan World Picture''. New York: Vintage Books, 1959.		Tillyard, E.M.W. ''The Elizabethan World Picture''. New York: Vintage Books, 1959.

WikiSysop at 22:06, 10 January 2017

2017-01-10T22:06:52Z

Pankratz at 09:16, 8 November 2012

2012-11-08T09:16:45Z

Pankratz at 17:09, 13 July 2010

2010-07-13T17:09:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 13 July 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	The '''concept of “correspondences”''' is especially relevant concerning the preservation of a monarch’s power. Not only was he or she – by nature – placed above all other human beings and therefore had the divine right to rule, but according to the correspondence, an act against the King would entail horrible consequences for the disloyal, the state and even the entire universe. This idea is summed up by E.M.W. Tillyard under the headline “Macrocosm and Body Politic”. It means that order in the state duplicates order in the macrocosmic world. It was an effective mechanism against any revolutionary tendencies within the state.		The '''concept of “correspondences”''' is especially relevant concerning the preservation of a monarch’s power. Not only was he or she – by nature – placed above all other human beings and therefore had the divine right to rule, but according to the correspondence, an act against the King would entail horrible consequences for the disloyal, the state and even the entire universe. This idea is summed up by E.M.W. Tillyard under the headline “Macrocosm and Body Politic”. It means that order in the state duplicates order in the macrocosmic world. It was an effective mechanism against any revolutionary tendencies within the state.

	Another form of correspondences is for example the interconnectedness of ~~“Macrocosm~~ and ~~Microcosm”~~; meaning what has been said above about the “four humours”, man resembling a universe in himself with four elements. In the same respect, the blood circling our veins equals the rivers flowing on the surface of the earth, our breath stands for the air, the hair for the grass and the heart in the centre of the human body is equaled to the sun in the centre of the universe. Just as the correspondence between the political body and the universe can preserve the monarch’s power, this idea could serve as a moral ~~statue~~ and hypothetically bring somebody to live a ~~‘healthy’~~ life.		Another form of correspondences is, for example, the interconnectedness of Macrocosm and Microcosm; meaning what has been said above about the “four humours”, man resembling a universe in himself with four elements. In the same respect, the blood circling our veins equals the rivers flowing on the surface of the earth, our breath stands for the air, the hair for the grass and the heart in the centre of the human body is equaled to the sun in the centre of the universe. Just as the correspondence between the political body and the universe can preserve the monarch’s power, this idea could serve as a moral statute and hypothetically bring somebody to live a healthy life.

	While the Great Chain of Being provides a comprehensible order for the people, the correspondences connect it to the people’s everyday life.		While the Great Chain of Being provides a comprehensible order for the people, the correspondences connect it to the people’s everyday life.
Line 35:		Line 35:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_chain_of_being		http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_chain_of_being

	Lovejoy, Arthur O.: ''The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the history of an idea'', Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.		Lovejoy, Arthur O. ''The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the history of an idea''. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.

	“Renaissance.” A Guide to the Study of Literature: A Companion Text for Core Studies 6, Landmarks of Literature. 23 Sept. 2001. Dept. of English, Brooklyn College, 10 July 2010. http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/ren.html.		“Renaissance.” A Guide to the Study of Literature: A Companion Text for Core Studies 6, Landmarks of Literature. 23 Sept. 2001. Dept. of English, Brooklyn College, 10 July 2010. http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/ren.html.

	Tillyard, E.M.W.~~: "~~The Elizabethan World Picture." New York: Vintage ~~Book~~, 1959.		Tillyard, E.M.W. ''The Elizabethan World Picture''. New York: Vintage Books, 1959.

Stallkbs at 21:44, 12 July 2010

2010-07-12T21:44:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 12 July 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Although the Chain of Being divides the different beings into groups, the concept of continuity is of high importance in the ideas of the Middle Ages. This means that there are no huge differences between the groups, for example, between animals and plants, because the lowest animals are those, which are already close to the status of plants, according to their abilities to interact and to move etc. Furthermore the concept of correspondence shows the relation of all groups to each other, showing that everything is part of God’s creation and therefore belongs together and cannot be separated completely, but only ordered.		Although the Chain of Being divides the different beings into groups, the concept of continuity is of high importance in the ideas of the Middle Ages. This means that there are no huge differences between the groups, for example, between animals and plants, because the lowest animals are those, which are already close to the status of plants, according to their abilities to interact and to move etc. Furthermore the concept of correspondence shows the relation of all groups to each other, showing that everything is part of God’s creation and therefore belongs together and cannot be separated completely, but only ordered.

			The '''concept of “correspondences”''' is especially relevant concerning the preservation of a monarch’s power. Not only was he or she – by nature – placed above all other human beings and therefore had the divine right to rule, but according to the correspondence, an act against the King would entail horrible consequences for the disloyal, the state and even the entire universe. This idea is summed up by E.M.W. Tillyard under the headline “Macrocosm and Body Politic”. It means that order in the state duplicates order in the macrocosmic world. It was an effective mechanism against any revolutionary tendencies within the state.

			Another form of correspondences is for example the interconnectedness of “Macrocosm and Microcosm”; meaning what has been said above about the “four humours”, man resembling a universe in himself with four elements. In the same respect, the blood circling our veins equals the rivers flowing on the surface of the earth, our breath stands for the air, the hair for the grass and the heart in the centre of the human body is equaled to the sun in the centre of the universe. Just as the correspondence between the political body and the universe can preserve the monarch’s power, this idea could serve as a moral statue and hypothetically bring somebody to live a ‘healthy’ life.

			While the Great Chain of Being provides a comprehensible order for the people, the correspondences connect it to the people’s everyday life.



Line 29:		Line 36:

	Lovejoy, Arthur O.: ''The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the history of an idea'', Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.		Lovejoy, Arthur O.: ''The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the history of an idea'', Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.

			“Renaissance.” A Guide to the Study of Literature: A Companion Text for Core Studies 6, Landmarks of Literature. 23 Sept. 2001. Dept. of English, Brooklyn College, 10 July 2010. http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/ren.html.

			Tillyard, E.M.W.: "The Elizabethan World Picture." New York: Vintage Book, 1959.

Pankratz at 11:51, 12 July 2010

2010-07-12T11:51:28Z

Isan at 11:56, 10 July 2010

2010-07-10T11:56:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:56, 10 July 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God.		The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God.

	((in ~~progress~~)		The concept of the Great Chain of Being or “scala naturae” gives every existing thing a place in the hierarchical structure made by God. It was used not only in the classical Christian period, but also in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.
			The Great Chain of Being differentiates and orders the things according to their propotion of “spirit” and “matter”. Creatures with more “spirit” have a higher position, than things containing more “matter”.
			The Great Chain of Being devides all beings in groups, which are also structured hierarchically within themselves:

			'''God''', as omnipotent and omnipresent creator of all other beings, is at the top of the ladder and consists only of “spirit”.

			'''Angels''' consist also only of “spirit” and are beyond the limitations of time. They possess language, emotions and feelings, but unlike God lack the omnipotence and omnipresence.
			The group of angels had several subdivisions during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, creating three, seven, nine or even ten different groups of angels, but most common was the devision made by Ps. Dionysius (~500 A.D) and St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) with nine groups of angels and their hierarchy: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones, Dominations, Principalities, Powers, Virtues, Archangels, Angels.

			'''Man''' combine “spirit” and “matter”, because they are spiritual beings with passion and reason, but also have a body and are bounded to the limitations of time. They have a special role in the chain of being, because of this duality between “spirit” and “matter”. Especially in the Renaissance the human being was seen as a “microcosm” reflecting the “macrocosm”, namely the structure of the world and its constituent parts: the four elements. The “humours” of the body “black bile”(earth), “yellow bile”(fire), “plegm” (water) and “blood”(air), resembled the four elements on earth. This shows also the correspondence between the different groups of the chain of being.
			In addition to that the concept of the chain of beings was not only used by humans to differentiate from other forms of beings, but also to create an order within themselves. Kings and Queens for example were directly positioned after the group of angels at the top of the groups of man (in other perspectives only adjusted to the Pope or on the same level with him). Other mighty people like Archbishops, Dukes and Bishops succeeded, while common people were seen in lower positions of the group of man. The chain therefore provided a rationale for the authority of the rulers.

			'''Animals''' lack the spiritual competence of human but are animated beings with limited intelligence. They are also classified in several subdivisions, according to their living spaces or their skills. For example animals like mussels are at the bottom of the chain, because they can not move on their own, whereas the lion and the elephant are considered as intelligent, powerful animals and therefore on the top of the animal group.

			'''Plants''' are living beings, which can grow and reproduce, but cannot move on their own and have no intelligence. Trees build the top of this group, while fungi are at its bottom.

			'''Minerals''' are the lowest beings, because they cannot grow and reproduce like plants and have no “spirit” but consist only of “matter”. They are devided into gems, metals and other forms of minerals like marble, sand etc.

			Although the Chain of Being devides the different beings into groups, the concept of continuity is of high importance in the ideas of the Middle Ages. This means that there are no huge bounds between the groups for example between animals and plants, because the lowest animals are those, which are already close to the status of plants, according to their abilities to interact and to move etc. Furthermore the concept of correspondence shows the relation of all groups to eachother, showing that everything is part of God’s creation and therefore belongs together and cannot be separated completely, but only ordered.


			==Sources:==

			http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/ren.html

			http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_chain_of_being

			Lovejoy, Arthur O.: The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the history of an idea, Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.

Isan at 09:54, 10 July 2010

2010-07-10T09:54:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:54, 10 July 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God.		The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God.

	~~[[Category:Expansion]]~~		((in progress)

WikiSysop: Created page with 'The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God. [[Category:E…'

2010-07-05T10:41:36Z

Created page with 'The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God. [[Category:E…'

New page

The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God.

[[Category:Expansion]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 10 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God.		The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God.

	The concept of the Great Chain of Being, "catena aurea" or “scala naturae” gives every existing thing a place in the hierarchical structure made by God. It was used not only in the classical Christian period, but also in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.		The concept of the Great Chain of Being, "catena aurea" or “scala naturae” gives every existing thing a place in the hierarchical structure made by God. It was used not only in the classical Christian period, but also in the Middle Ages and the [[Renaissance]].
	The Great Chain of Being differentiates and orders the things according to their proportion of “spirit” and “matter”. Creatures with more “spirit” have a higher position, than things containing more “matter”.		The Great Chain of Being differentiates and orders the things according to their proportion of “spirit” and “matter”. Creatures with more “spirit” have a higher position, than things containing more “matter”.
	The Great Chain of Being divides all beings in groups, which are also structured hierarchically within themselves:		The Great Chain of Being divides all beings in groups, which are also structured hierarchically within themselves:
Line 10:		Line 10:
	The group of angels had several subdivisions during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, creating three, seven, nine or even ten different groups of angels, but most common was the division made by Dionysius (~500 A.D) and St Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) with nine groups of angels and their hierarchy: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones, Dominations, Principalities, Powers, Virtues, Archangels, Angels.		The group of angels had several subdivisions during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, creating three, seven, nine or even ten different groups of angels, but most common was the division made by Dionysius (~500 A.D) and St Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) with nine groups of angels and their hierarchy: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones, Dominations, Principalities, Powers, Virtues, Archangels, Angels.

	'''Man''' combines “spirit” and “matter”, because human beings are spiritual beings with passion and reason, but also have a body and are bound to the limitations of time. They have a special role in the chain of being, because of this duality between “spirit” and “matter”. Especially in the Renaissance the human being was seen as a ~~“microcosm”~~ reflecting the “macrocosm”, namely the structure of the world and its constituent parts: the four elements. The “[[humours]]” of the body “black bile”(earth), “yellow bile”(fire), “phlegm” (water) and “blood” (air), resembled the four elements. This shows also the correspondence between the different groups of the chain of being.		'''Man''' combines “spirit” and “matter”, because human beings are spiritual beings with passion and reason, but also have a body and are bound to the limitations of time. They have a special role in the chain of being, because of this duality between “spirit” and “matter”. Especially in the Renaissance the human being was seen as a “[[microcosm]]” reflecting the “macrocosm”, namely the structure of the world and its constituent parts: the four elements. The “[[humours]]” of the body “black bile”(earth), “yellow bile”(fire), “phlegm” (water) and “blood” (air), resembled the four elements. This shows also the correspondence between the different groups of the chain of being.
	In addition to that the concept of the Chain of Being was not only used by humans to differentiate themselves from other forms of beings, but also to create an order within themselves. Kings and Queens, for example, were directly positioned after the group of angels at the top of the groups of man (in other versions they are only below the Pope or on the same level with him). Other mighty people like Archbishops, Dukes and Bishops succeeded, while common people were seen in lower positions. The chain therefore provided a rationale for the authority of the rulers.		In addition to that the concept of the Chain of Being was not only used by humans to differentiate themselves from other forms of beings, but also to create an order within themselves. Kings and Queens, for example, were directly positioned after the group of angels at the top of the groups of man (in other versions they are only below the Pope or on the same level with him). Other mighty people like Archbishops, Dukes and Bishops succeeded, while common people were seen in lower positions. The chain therefore provided a rationale for the authority of the rulers.

Line 21:		Line 21:
	Although the Chain of Being divides the different beings into groups, the concept of continuity is of high importance. This means that there are no huge differences between the groups, for example, between animals and plants, because the lowest animals are those, which are already close to the status of plants, according to their abilities to interact and to move etc. Furthermore the concept of correspondence shows the relation of all groups to each other, showing that everything is part of God’s creation and therefore belongs together and cannot be separated completely, but only ordered.		Although the Chain of Being divides the different beings into groups, the concept of continuity is of high importance. This means that there are no huge differences between the groups, for example, between animals and plants, because the lowest animals are those, which are already close to the status of plants, according to their abilities to interact and to move etc. Furthermore the concept of correspondence shows the relation of all groups to each other, showing that everything is part of God’s creation and therefore belongs together and cannot be separated completely, but only ordered.

	The '''concept of “correspondences”''' is especially relevant concerning the preservation of a monarch’s power. Not only was he or she – by nature – placed above all other human beings and therefore had the god-given right to rule, but according to the correspondence, an act against the King would entail horrible consequences for the disloyal, the state and even the entire universe. This idea is summed up by E.M.W. Tillyard under the headline “Macrocosm and Body ~~Politic”~~. It means that order in the state duplicates order in the macrocosmic world. It was an effective mechanism against any revolutionary tendencies within the state.		The '''concept of “correspondences”''' is especially relevant concerning the preservation of a monarch’s power. Not only was he or she – by nature – placed above all other human beings and therefore had the god-given right to rule, but according to the correspondence, an act against the King would entail horrible consequences for the disloyal, the state and even the entire universe. This idea is summed up by E.M.W. Tillyard under the headline “Macrocosm and [[The King's Two Bodies\|Body Politic]]”. It means that order in the state duplicates order in the macrocosmic world. It was an effective mechanism against any revolutionary tendencies within the state.

	Another form of correspondences is, for example, the interconnectedness of Macrocosm and Microcosm; meaning what has been said above about the “four humours”, man resembling a universe in himself with four elements. In the same respect, the blood circling our veins equals the rivers flowing on the surface of the earth, our breath stands for the air, the hair for the grass and the heart in the centre of the human body is ~~equaled~~ to the sun in the centre of the universe. Just as the correspondence between the political body and the universe can preserve the monarch’s power, this idea could serve as a moral statute and hypothetically bring somebody to live a healthy life.		Another form of correspondences is, for example, the interconnectedness of Macrocosm and Microcosm; meaning what has been said above about the “four humours”, man resembling a universe in himself with four elements. In the same respect, the blood circling our veins equals the rivers flowing on the surface of the earth, our breath stands for the air, the hair for the grass and the heart in the centre of the human body is equalled to the sun in the centre of the universe. Just as the correspondence between the political body and the universe can preserve the monarch’s power, this idea could serve as a moral statute and hypothetically bring somebody to live a healthy life.

	While the Great Chain of Being provides a comprehensible order for the people, the correspondences connect it to the people’s everyday life.		While the Great Chain of Being provides a comprehensible order for the people, the correspondences connect it to the people’s everyday life.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:16, 8 November 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God.		The hierarchical structure of all matter and living beings. A classical and medieval Christian concept, the Great Chain of Being was believed to be ordained by God.

	The concept of the Great Chain of Being or “scala naturae” gives every existing thing a place in the hierarchical structure made by God. It was used not only in the classical Christian period, but also in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.		The concept of the Great Chain of Being, "catena aurea" or “scala naturae” gives every existing thing a place in the hierarchical structure made by God. It was used not only in the classical Christian period, but also in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.
	The Great Chain of Being differentiates and orders the things according to their proportion of “spirit” and “matter”. Creatures with more “spirit” have a higher position, than things containing more “matter”.		The Great Chain of Being differentiates and orders the things according to their proportion of “spirit” and “matter”. Creatures with more “spirit” have a higher position, than things containing more “matter”.
	The Great Chain of Being divides all beings in groups, which are also structured hierarchically within themselves:		The Great Chain of Being divides all beings in groups, which are also structured hierarchically within themselves:
Line 10:		Line 10:
	The group of angels had several subdivisions during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, creating three, seven, nine or even ten different groups of angels, but most common was the division made by Dionysius (~500 A.D) and St Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) with nine groups of angels and their hierarchy: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones, Dominations, Principalities, Powers, Virtues, Archangels, Angels.		The group of angels had several subdivisions during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, creating three, seven, nine or even ten different groups of angels, but most common was the division made by Dionysius (~500 A.D) and St Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) with nine groups of angels and their hierarchy: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones, Dominations, Principalities, Powers, Virtues, Archangels, Angels.

	'''Man''' combines “spirit” and “matter”, because human beings are spiritual beings with passion and reason, but also have a body and are bound to the limitations of time. They have a special role in the chain of being, because of this duality between “spirit” and “matter”. Especially in the Renaissance the human being was seen as a “microcosm” reflecting the “macrocosm”, namely the structure of the world and its constituent parts: the four elements. The ~~“humours”~~ of the body “black bile”(earth), “yellow bile”(fire), “phlegm” (water) and “blood” (air), resembled the four elements. This shows also the correspondence between the different groups of the chain of being.		'''Man''' combines “spirit” and “matter”, because human beings are spiritual beings with passion and reason, but also have a body and are bound to the limitations of time. They have a special role in the chain of being, because of this duality between “spirit” and “matter”. Especially in the Renaissance the human being was seen as a “microcosm” reflecting the “macrocosm”, namely the structure of the world and its constituent parts: the four elements. The “[[humours]]” of the body “black bile”(earth), “yellow bile”(fire), “phlegm” (water) and “blood” (air), resembled the four elements. This shows also the correspondence between the different groups of the chain of being.
	In addition to that the concept of the ~~chain~~ of ~~being~~ was not only used by humans to differentiate themselves from other forms of beings, but also to create an order within themselves. Kings and Queens for example were directly positioned after the group of angels at the top of the groups of man (in other versions they are only below the Pope or on the same level with him). Other mighty people like Archbishops, Dukes and Bishops succeeded, while common people were seen in lower positions. The chain therefore provided a rationale for the authority of the rulers.		In addition to that the concept of the Chain of Being was not only used by humans to differentiate themselves from other forms of beings, but also to create an order within themselves. Kings and Queens, for example, were directly positioned after the group of angels at the top of the groups of man (in other versions they are only below the Pope or on the same level with him). Other mighty people like Archbishops, Dukes and Bishops succeeded, while common people were seen in lower positions. The chain therefore provided a rationale for the authority of the rulers.

	'''Animals''' lack the spiritual competence of humans but are animated beings with limited intelligence. They are also classified in several subdivisions, according to their living spaces or their skills. For example animals like mussels are at the bottom of the chain, because they can not move on their own, whereas the lion and the elephant are considered as intelligent, powerful animals and therefore on the top of the animal group.		'''Animals''' lack the spiritual competence of humans but are animated beings with limited intelligence. They are also classified in several subdivisions, according to their living spaces or their skills. For example, animals like mussels are at the bottom of the chain, because they can not move on their own, whereas the lion and the elephant are considered as intelligent, powerful animals and therefore on the top of the animal group.

	'''Plants''' are living beings, which can grow and reproduce, but cannot move on their own and have no intelligence. Trees build the top of this group, while fungi are at its bottom.		'''Plants''' are living beings, which can grow and reproduce, but cannot move on their own and have no intelligence. Trees build the top of this group, while fungi are at its bottom.
Line 19:		Line 19:
	'''Minerals''' are the lowest beings, because they cannot grow and reproduce like plants and have no “spirit” but consist only of “matter”. They are divided into gems, metals and other forms of minerals like marble, sand etc.		'''Minerals''' are the lowest beings, because they cannot grow and reproduce like plants and have no “spirit” but consist only of “matter”. They are divided into gems, metals and other forms of minerals like marble, sand etc.

	Although the Chain of Being divides the different beings into groups, the concept of continuity is of high importance ~~in the ideas of the Middle Ages~~. This means that there are no huge differences between the groups, for example, between animals and plants, because the lowest animals are those, which are already close to the status of plants, according to their abilities to interact and to move etc. Furthermore the concept of correspondence shows the relation of all groups to each other, showing that everything is part of God’s creation and therefore belongs together and cannot be separated completely, but only ordered.		Although the Chain of Being divides the different beings into groups, the concept of continuity is of high importance. This means that there are no huge differences between the groups, for example, between animals and plants, because the lowest animals are those, which are already close to the status of plants, according to their abilities to interact and to move etc. Furthermore the concept of correspondence shows the relation of all groups to each other, showing that everything is part of God’s creation and therefore belongs together and cannot be separated completely, but only ordered.

	The '''concept of “correspondences”''' is especially relevant concerning the preservation of a monarch’s power. Not only was he or she – by nature – placed above all other human beings and therefore had the ~~divine~~ right to rule, but according to the correspondence, an act against the King would entail horrible consequences for the disloyal, the state and even the entire universe. This idea is summed up by E.M.W. Tillyard under the headline “Macrocosm and Body Politic”. It means that order in the state duplicates order in the macrocosmic world. It was an effective mechanism against any revolutionary tendencies within the state.		The '''concept of “correspondences”''' is especially relevant concerning the preservation of a monarch’s power. Not only was he or she – by nature – placed above all other human beings and therefore had the god-given right to rule, but according to the correspondence, an act against the King would entail horrible consequences for the disloyal, the state and even the entire universe. This idea is summed up by E.M.W. Tillyard under the headline “Macrocosm and Body Politic”. It means that order in the state duplicates order in the macrocosmic world. It was an effective mechanism against any revolutionary tendencies within the state.

	Another form of correspondences is, for example, the interconnectedness of Macrocosm and Microcosm; meaning what has been said above about the “four humours”, man resembling a universe in himself with four elements. In the same respect, the blood circling our veins equals the rivers flowing on the surface of the earth, our breath stands for the air, the hair for the grass and the heart in the centre of the human body is equaled to the sun in the centre of the universe. Just as the correspondence between the political body and the universe can preserve the monarch’s power, this idea could serve as a moral statute and hypothetically bring somebody to live a healthy life.		Another form of correspondences is, for example, the interconnectedness of Macrocosm and Microcosm; meaning what has been said above about the “four humours”, man resembling a universe in himself with four elements. In the same respect, the blood circling our veins equals the rivers flowing on the surface of the earth, our breath stands for the air, the hair for the grass and the heart in the centre of the human body is equaled to the sun in the centre of the universe. Just as the correspondence between the political body and the universe can preserve the monarch’s power, this idea could serve as a moral statute and hypothetically bring somebody to live a healthy life.
Line 32:		Line 32:

	http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/ren.html		http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/ren.html

	~~http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_chain_of_being~~

	Lovejoy, Arthur O. ''The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the history of an idea''. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.		Lovejoy, Arthur O. ''The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the history of an idea''. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:51, 12 July 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The concept of the Great Chain of Being or “scala naturae” gives every existing thing a place in the hierarchical structure made by God. It was used not only in the classical Christian period, but also in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.		The concept of the Great Chain of Being or “scala naturae” gives every existing thing a place in the hierarchical structure made by God. It was used not only in the classical Christian period, but also in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.
	The Great Chain of Being differentiates and orders the things according to their ~~propotion~~ of “spirit” and “matter”. Creatures with more “spirit” have a higher position, than things containing more “matter”.		The Great Chain of Being differentiates and orders the things according to their proportion of “spirit” and “matter”. Creatures with more “spirit” have a higher position, than things containing more “matter”.
	The Great Chain of Being ~~devides~~ all beings in groups, which are also structured hierarchically within themselves:		The Great Chain of Being divides all beings in groups, which are also structured hierarchically within themselves:

	'''God''', as omnipotent and omnipresent creator of all other beings, is at the top of the ladder and consists only of “spirit”.		'''God''', as omnipotent and omnipresent creator of all other beings, is at the top of the ladder and consists only of “spirit”.

	'''Angels''' consist also only of “spirit” and are beyond the limitations of time. They possess language, emotions and feelings, but unlike God lack ~~the~~ omnipotence and omnipresence.		'''Angels''' consist also only of “spirit” and are beyond the limitations of time. They possess language, emotions and feelings, but unlike God lack omnipotence and omnipresence.
	The group of angels had several subdivisions during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, creating three, seven, nine or even ten different groups of angels, but most common was the ~~devision~~ made by ~~Ps.~~ Dionysius (~500 A.D) and St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) with nine groups of angels and their hierarchy: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones, Dominations, Principalities, Powers, Virtues, Archangels, Angels.		The group of angels had several subdivisions during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, creating three, seven, nine or even ten different groups of angels, but most common was the division made by Dionysius (~500 A.D) and St Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) with nine groups of angels and their hierarchy: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones, Dominations, Principalities, Powers, Virtues, Archangels, Angels.

	'''Man''' ~~combine~~ “spirit” and “matter”, because ~~they~~ are spiritual beings with passion and reason, but also have a body and are ~~bounded~~ to the limitations of time. They have a special role in the chain of being, because of this duality between “spirit” and “matter”. Especially in the Renaissance the human being was seen as a “microcosm” reflecting the “macrocosm”, namely the structure of the world and its constituent parts: the four elements. The “humours” of the body “black bile”(earth), “yellow bile”(fire), ~~“plegm”~~ (water) and “blood”(air), resembled the four elements ~~on earth~~. This shows also the correspondence between the different groups of the chain of being.		'''Man''' combines “spirit” and “matter”, because human beings are spiritual beings with passion and reason, but also have a body and are bound to the limitations of time. They have a special role in the chain of being, because of this duality between “spirit” and “matter”. Especially in the Renaissance the human being was seen as a “microcosm” reflecting the “macrocosm”, namely the structure of the world and its constituent parts: the four elements. The “humours” of the body “black bile”(earth), “yellow bile”(fire), “phlegm” (water) and “blood” (air), resembled the four elements. This shows also the correspondence between the different groups of the chain of being.
	In addition to that the concept of the chain of ~~beings~~ was not only used by humans to differentiate from other forms of beings, but also to create an order within themselves. Kings and Queens for example were directly positioned after the group of angels at the top of the groups of man (in other ~~perspectives~~ only ~~adjusted to~~ the Pope or on the same level with him). Other mighty people like Archbishops, Dukes and Bishops succeeded, while common people were seen in lower positions ~~of the group of man~~. The chain therefore provided a rationale for the authority of the rulers.		In addition to that the concept of the chain of being was not only used by humans to differentiate themselves from other forms of beings, but also to create an order within themselves. Kings and Queens for example were directly positioned after the group of angels at the top of the groups of man (in other versions they are only below the Pope or on the same level with him). Other mighty people like Archbishops, Dukes and Bishops succeeded, while common people were seen in lower positions. The chain therefore provided a rationale for the authority of the rulers.

	'''Animals''' lack the spiritual competence of ~~human~~ but are animated beings with limited intelligence. They are also classified in several subdivisions, according to their living spaces or their skills. For example animals like mussels are at the bottom of the chain, because they can not move on their own, whereas the lion and the elephant are considered as intelligent, powerful animals and therefore on the top of the animal group.		'''Animals''' lack the spiritual competence of humans but are animated beings with limited intelligence. They are also classified in several subdivisions, according to their living spaces or their skills. For example animals like mussels are at the bottom of the chain, because they can not move on their own, whereas the lion and the elephant are considered as intelligent, powerful animals and therefore on the top of the animal group.

	'''Plants''' are living beings, which can grow and reproduce, but cannot move on their own and have no intelligence. Trees build the top of this group, while fungi are at its bottom.		'''Plants''' are living beings, which can grow and reproduce, but cannot move on their own and have no intelligence. Trees build the top of this group, while fungi are at its bottom.

	'''Minerals''' are the lowest beings, because they cannot grow and reproduce like plants and have no “spirit” but consist only of “matter”. They are ~~devided~~ into gems, metals and other forms of minerals like marble, sand etc.		'''Minerals''' are the lowest beings, because they cannot grow and reproduce like plants and have no “spirit” but consist only of “matter”. They are divided into gems, metals and other forms of minerals like marble, sand etc.

	Although the Chain of Being ~~devides~~ the different beings into groups, the concept of continuity is of high importance in the ideas of the Middle Ages. This means that there are no huge ~~bounds~~ between the groups for example between animals and plants, because the lowest animals are those, which are already close to the status of plants, according to their abilities to interact and to move etc. Furthermore the concept of correspondence shows the relation of all groups to ~~eachother~~, showing that everything is part of God’s creation and therefore belongs together and cannot be separated completely, but only ordered.		Although the Chain of Being divides the different beings into groups, the concept of continuity is of high importance in the ideas of the Middle Ages. This means that there are no huge differences between the groups, for example, between animals and plants, because the lowest animals are those, which are already close to the status of plants, according to their abilities to interact and to move etc. Furthermore the concept of correspondence shows the relation of all groups to each other, showing that everything is part of God’s creation and therefore belongs together and cannot be separated completely, but only ordered.


Line 28:		Line 28:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_chain_of_being		http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_chain_of_being

	Lovejoy, Arthur O.: The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the history of an idea, Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.		Lovejoy, Arthur O.: ''The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the history of an idea'', Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961.