<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=One-sex_model</id>
	<title>One-sex model - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=One-sex_model"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=One-sex_model&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-11T15:23:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=One-sex_model&amp;diff=8575&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>WikiSysop at 11:15, 21 November 2012</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=One-sex_model&amp;diff=8575&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-11-21T11:15:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 11:15, 21 November 2012&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l3&quot;&gt;Line 3:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 3:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The term &amp;quot;one-sex model&amp;quot; was coined by the cultural historian Thomas Laqueur, who argues that the perception of biological similarities between men and women, e.g. with regard to the reproductive organs, governed the work of famous physicians of Classical antiquity, e.g. Galen, and was also prevalent in [[Renaissance]] times. By contrast, the two-sex model - the notion of significant differences between men and women - was invented as late as the 18th century. Now, the biological distinctiveness was seen in conjunction with alleged differences in cognition, intellect, emotions, morality and social roles.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The term &amp;quot;one-sex model&amp;quot; was coined by the cultural historian Thomas Laqueur, who argues that the perception of biological similarities between men and women, e.g. with regard to the reproductive organs, governed the work of famous physicians of Classical antiquity, e.g. Galen, and was also prevalent in [[Renaissance]] times. By contrast, the two-sex model - the notion of significant differences between men and women - was invented as late as the 18th century. Now, the biological distinctiveness was seen in conjunction with alleged differences in cognition, intellect, emotions, morality and social roles.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;According to Laqueur, the two theories of sexual difference influence the relationship between sex and gender identity. In the logic of the one-sex model, spontaneous sex changes (from female to male) &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;werew &lt;/del&gt;perfectly possible, if rare. Since the biological boundaries between men and women were blurry, it was all the more important to police gender identities; for example, women were not allowed to wear trousers. By contrast, the two-sex model presumes stable male and female bodies &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;(&lt;/del&gt;despite the recent possibility of sex change operations, there is still the matter of DNA, i.e. female XX and male XY chromosomes&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;)&lt;/del&gt;. &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;It &lt;/del&gt;expects and prescribes a female gender identity for female bodies and a male identity for male bodies. It has therefore problems to incorporate the phenomena of intersexuality (&quot;hermaphroditism&quot;) and homosexuality: the latter concept did not exist before 1900, and the notion of same-sex intercourse had different implications &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;under the one-sex model&lt;/del&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;According to Laqueur, the two theories of sexual difference influence the relationship between sex and gender identity. In the logic of the one-sex model, spontaneous sex changes (from female to male) &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;were &lt;/ins&gt;perfectly possible, if rare. Since the biological boundaries between men and women were blurry, it was all the more important to police gender identities; for example, women were not allowed to wear trousers. By contrast, the two-sex model presumes stable male and female bodies&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;; &lt;/ins&gt;despite the recent possibility of sex change operations, there is still the matter of DNA, i.e. female XX and male XY chromosomes. &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The two-sex model &lt;/ins&gt;expects and prescribes a female gender identity for female bodies and a male identity for male bodies. It has therefore problems to incorporate the phenomena of intersexuality (&quot;hermaphroditism&quot;) and homosexuality: the latter concept did not exist before 1900, and the notion of same-sex intercourse had different implications &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;in Renaissance times&lt;/ins&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysop</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=One-sex_model&amp;diff=8574&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>WikiSysop at 11:13, 21 November 2012</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=One-sex_model&amp;diff=8574&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-11-21T11:13:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 11:13, 21 November 2012&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l3&quot;&gt;Line 3:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 3:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The term &amp;quot;one-sex model&amp;quot; was coined by the cultural historian Thomas Laqueur, who argues that the perception of biological similarities between men and women, e.g. with regard to the reproductive organs, governed the work of famous physicians of Classical antiquity, e.g. Galen, and was also prevalent in [[Renaissance]] times. By contrast, the two-sex model - the notion of significant differences between men and women - was invented as late as the 18th century. Now, the biological distinctiveness was seen in conjunction with alleged differences in cognition, intellect, emotions, morality and social roles.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The term &amp;quot;one-sex model&amp;quot; was coined by the cultural historian Thomas Laqueur, who argues that the perception of biological similarities between men and women, e.g. with regard to the reproductive organs, governed the work of famous physicians of Classical antiquity, e.g. Galen, and was also prevalent in [[Renaissance]] times. By contrast, the two-sex model - the notion of significant differences between men and women - was invented as late as the 18th century. Now, the biological distinctiveness was seen in conjunction with alleged differences in cognition, intellect, emotions, morality and social roles.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;According to Laqueur, the two-sex model &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;also changed &lt;/del&gt;the &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;relationship &lt;/del&gt;between &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;sex &lt;/del&gt;and gender &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;identity: &lt;/del&gt;for female bodies, a &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;stable &lt;/del&gt;female gender identity &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;was expected and prescribed, &lt;/del&gt;and a male identity for male bodies. &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The attitudes towards &lt;/del&gt;homosexuality &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;changed as well&lt;/del&gt;: the concept did not exist before 1900, and the notion of same-sex intercourse had different implications under the one-sex model.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;According to Laqueur, the two &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;theories of sexual difference influence the relationship between sex and gender identity. In the logic of the one&lt;/ins&gt;-sex model&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, spontaneous sex changes (from female to male) werew perfectly possible, if rare. Since &lt;/ins&gt;the &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;biological boundaries &lt;/ins&gt;between &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;men &lt;/ins&gt;and &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;women were blurry, it was all the more important to police &lt;/ins&gt;gender &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;identities; &lt;/ins&gt;for &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;example, women were not allowed to wear trousers. By contrast, the two-sex model presumes stable male and &lt;/ins&gt;female bodies &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;(despite the recent possibility of sex change operations, there is still the matter of DNA&lt;/ins&gt;, &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;i.e. female XX and male XY chromosomes). It expects and prescribes &lt;/ins&gt;a female gender identity &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;for female bodies &lt;/ins&gt;and a male identity for male bodies. &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;It has therefore problems to incorporate the phenomena of intersexuality (&quot;hermaphroditism&quot;) and &lt;/ins&gt;homosexuality: the &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;latter &lt;/ins&gt;concept did not exist before 1900, and the notion of same-sex intercourse had different implications under the one-sex model.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysop</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=One-sex_model&amp;diff=8571&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>WikiSysop: Created page with &#039;A way of understanding sex. A model of human anatomy that basically regards men and women as two variations of one sex. The female body appears as an inferior or not fully develo…&#039;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=One-sex_model&amp;diff=8571&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-11-20T00:11:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#039;A way of understanding sex. A model of human anatomy that basically regards men and women as two variations of one sex. The female body appears as an inferior or not fully develo…&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;A way of understanding sex. A model of human anatomy that basically regards men and women as two variations of one sex. The female body appears as an inferior or not fully developed form of the male body, in which the sexual organs have been pushed outward by heat (cp. [[humours]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;one-sex model&amp;quot; was coined by the cultural historian Thomas Laqueur, who argues that the perception of biological similarities between men and women, e.g. with regard to the reproductive organs, governed the work of famous physicians of Classical antiquity, e.g. Galen, and was also prevalent in [[Renaissance]] times. By contrast, the two-sex model - the notion of significant differences between men and women - was invented as late as the 18th century. Now, the biological distinctiveness was seen in conjunction with alleged differences in cognition, intellect, emotions, morality and social roles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Laqueur, the two-sex model also changed the relationship between sex and gender identity: for female bodies, a stable female gender identity was expected and prescribed, and a male identity for male bodies. The attitudes towards homosexuality changed as well: the concept did not exist before 1900, and the notion of same-sex intercourse had different implications under the one-sex model.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysop</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>