Separation of Spheres - Revision history

Pankratz at 15:47, 19 November 2013

2013-11-19T15:47:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 19 November 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:
	In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a separation of male and/or female gender roles in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties. The male duties can also be referred to as ''privileged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definition in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination" (male power over women).		In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a separation of male and/or female gender roles in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties. The male duties can also be referred to as ''privileged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definition in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination" (male power over women).

	By contrasting two literary works, firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly John Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand the attitudes towards the separation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintenance of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".		By contrasting two literary works, firstly John Ruskin's ''Of Queens Gardens'' and secondly John Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand the attitudes towards the separation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintenance of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".

	This idea about the segregation of the two spheres of life can be seen as quite idealized, as no one really lived completely in the private or public as stated in the theory. Upper-class women for instance were far more public than private, and lower-class women were also far more public than private. But both in different ways.		This idea about the segregation of the two spheres of life can be seen as quite idealized, as no one really lived completely in the private or public as stated in the theory. Upper-class women for instance were far more public than private, and lower-class women were also far more public than private. But both in different ways.

Pankratz at 17:58, 14 November 2013

2013-11-14T17:58:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:58, 14 November 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:


	== Private and Public==		== Private and Public ==


Line 14:		Line 14:


	~~'''~~Justifications/Discourses~~'''~~		== Justifications/Discourses ==

	According to John Ruskin, the female role is supposedly dependent and also determined by nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the separation of the spheres and contrasts with Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and are thus a result of an artificial cultivation.		According to John Ruskin, the female role is supposedly dependent and also determined by nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the separation of the spheres and contrasts with Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and are thus a result of an artificial cultivation.

Pankratz at 17:58, 14 November 2013

2013-11-14T17:58:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:58, 14 November 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Gender-based division of social spheres into domestic (for women) and public (for men). Emerges in the 18th centuries due to the Industrial Revolution and becomes the dominant ideology in the 19th century.



	== Private and Public==		== Private and Public==


	In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a separation of male and/or female gender roles in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties ~~such as domestic life~~. The male duties can also be referred to as ''privileged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definition in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination" (male power over women).		In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a separation of male and/or female gender roles in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties. The male duties can also be referred to as ''privileged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definition in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination" (male power over women).

	By contrasting two literary works, firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly John Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand the attitudes towards the separation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintenance of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".		By contrasting two literary works, firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly John Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand the attitudes towards the separation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintenance of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".
Line 10:		Line 14:


	'''~~Nature~~'''		'''Justifications/Discourses'''

	According to John Ruskin, the female role is dependent and also determined by the supposedly inherent nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the separation of the spheres and contrasts totally Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and are thus a result of an artificial cultivation.

			According to John Ruskin, the female role is supposedly dependent and also determined by nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the separation of the spheres and contrasts with Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and are thus a result of an artificial cultivation.
	~~'''Education''~~'

	In trying to find an additional way to justify the separation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankind’s abilities from doubling the world’s intellectual talents by not teaching women.		In trying to find an additional way to justify the separation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankind’s abilities from doubling the world’s intellectual talents by not teaching women.
Line 22:		Line 23:

	----		----
	'''~~Sources~~'''		'''Source'''

	~~Millet, Kate: "The Debate over Women". In: Vicinus, Martha (ed.): ''Suffer and be still''. Place???: Indiana University Press, 1972. 121-139.~~

	~~http~~:~~//wiki~~.~~answers~~.~~com/Q/What_does_separate_spheres_mean~~		Millet, Kate: "The Debate over Women". In: Vicinus, Martha (ed.): ''Suffer and be still''. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1972. 121-139.

Pankratz at 08:45, 26 January 2010

2010-01-26T08:45:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:45, 26 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== ~~Separation of the Spheres -~~ Private and Public-==		== Private and Public==


	In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a separation of male and/or female roles ~~(duties)~~ in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties such as domestic life. The male duties can also be referred to as ''privileged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definition in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination" (male power over women).		In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a separation of male and/or female gender roles in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties such as domestic life. The male duties can also be referred to as ''privileged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definition in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination" (male power over women).

	By contrasting two literary works. firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand ~~easily~~ the attitudes towards the separation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintenance of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".		By contrasting two literary works, firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly John Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand the attitudes towards the separation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintenance of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".

	This idea about the segregation of the two spheres of life can be seen as quite idealized, as no one really lived completely in the private or public as stated in the theory. Upper class women for instance were far more public than private, and ~~low~~ class women were also far more public than private. But both in different ways.		This idea about the segregation of the two spheres of life can be seen as quite idealized, as no one really lived completely in the private or public as stated in the theory. Upper-class women for instance were far more public than private, and lower-class women were also far more public than private. But both in different ways.


Line 12:		Line 12:
	'''Nature'''		'''Nature'''

	According to Ruskin, the female role is ~~dependant~~ and also determined by the inherent nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the separation of the spheres and contrasts totally Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and are thus a result of an artificial cultivation.		According to John Ruskin, the female role is dependent and also determined by the supposedly inherent nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the separation of the spheres and contrasts totally Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and are thus a result of an artificial cultivation.


	'''Education'''		'''Education'''

	In trying to find an additional way to justify the separation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other ~~Hand~~ there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankind’s abilities from doubling the world’s intellectual talents by not teaching women.		In trying to find an additional way to justify the separation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankind’s abilities from doubling the world’s intellectual talents by not teaching women.


Line 24:		Line 24:
	'''Sources'''		'''Sources'''

	Millet, Kate: The Debate over Women. in: Vicinus, Martha (ed.): Suffer and be still. Indiana University Press, 1972~~. pp~~. 121-139.		Millet, Kate: "The Debate over Women". In: Vicinus, Martha (ed.): ''Suffer and be still''. Place???: Indiana University Press, 1972. 121-139.

	http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_separate_spheres_mean		http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_separate_spheres_mean

Retnüg at 19:55, 25 January 2010

2010-01-25T19:55:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:55, 25 January 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	'''Nature'''		'''Nature'''

	According to Ruskin, the female role is dependant and also determined by the inherent nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the separation of the spheres and contrasts totally Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and thus a result of an artificial cultivation.		According to Ruskin, the female role is dependant and also determined by the inherent nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the separation of the spheres and contrasts totally Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and are thus a result of an artificial cultivation.

Retnüg at 19:44, 25 January 2010

2010-01-25T19:44:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 25 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Separation of the Spheres -~~Nature~~ and ~~Education~~ ==		== Separation of the Spheres - Private and Public-==


	In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a ~~seperation~~ of male and/or female roles (duties) in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties such as domestic life. The male duties can also be ~~reffered~~ to as ''~~priviledged~~ duties'' whereas female duties allow a ~~definiton~~ in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination" (male power over women).		In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a separation of male and/or female roles (duties) in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties such as domestic life. The male duties can also be referred to as ''privileged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definition in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination" (male power over women).

	By contrasting two literary works. firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand easily the attitudes towards the ~~seperation~~ of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the ~~maintainance~~ of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".		By contrasting two literary works. firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand easily the attitudes towards the separation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintenance of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".

	This idea about the segregation of the two spheres of ~~lifecan~~ be seen as quite idealized, as no one really lived completely in the private or public as stated in the theory. Upper class women for instance were far more public than private, and low class women were also far more public than private. But both in different ways.		This idea about the segregation of the two spheres of life can be seen as quite idealized, as no one really lived completely in the private or public as stated in the theory. Upper class women for instance were far more public than private, and low class women were also far more public than private. But both in different ways.


Line 12:		Line 12:
	'''Nature'''		'''Nature'''

	According to Ruskin, the female role is dependant and also determined by the inherent nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the ~~seperation~~ of the spheres and contrasts totally Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and thus a result of an artificial cultivation.		According to Ruskin, the female role is dependant and also determined by the inherent nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the separation of the spheres and contrasts totally Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and thus a result of an artificial cultivation.


	'''Education'''		'''Education'''

	In trying to find an additional way to justify the ~~seperation~~ of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other Hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing ~~mankinds~~ abilities from doubling the ~~worlds intelectual~~ talents by not ~~teching~~ women.		In trying to find an additional way to justify the separation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other Hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankind’s abilities from doubling the world’s intellectual talents by not teaching women.


Line 24:		Line 25:

	Millet, Kate: The Debate over Women. in: Vicinus, Martha (ed.): Suffer and be still. Indiana University Press, 1972. pp. 121-139.		Millet, Kate: The Debate over Women. in: Vicinus, Martha (ed.): Suffer and be still. Indiana University Press, 1972. pp. 121-139.

			http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_separate_spheres_mean

Retnüg at 19:40, 25 January 2010

2010-01-25T19:40:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 25 January 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:


	In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a seperation of male and/or female roles (duties) in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties such as domestic life. The male duties can also be reffered to as ''priviledged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definiton in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination".		In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a seperation of male and/or female roles (duties) in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties such as domestic life. The male duties can also be reffered to as ''priviledged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definiton in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination" (male power over women).

	By contrasting two literary works. firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand easily the attitudes towards the seperation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintainance of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".		By contrasting two literary works. firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand easily the attitudes towards the seperation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintainance of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".

			This idea about the segregation of the two spheres of lifecan be seen as quite idealized, as no one really lived completely in the private or public as stated in the theory. Upper class women for instance were far more public than private, and low class women were also far more public than private. But both in different ways.



Line 14:		Line 17:

	In trying to find an additional way to justify the seperation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other Hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankinds abilities from doubling the worlds intelectual talents by not teching women.		In trying to find an additional way to justify the seperation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other Hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankinds abilities from doubling the worlds intelectual talents by not teching women.



	~~== Neo-Paladianism ==~~

Retnüg at 19:26, 25 January 2010

2010-01-25T19:26:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 25 January 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:

	In trying to find an additional way to justify the seperation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other Hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankinds abilities from doubling the worlds intelectual talents by not teching women.		In trying to find an additional way to justify the seperation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other Hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankinds abilities from doubling the worlds intelectual talents by not teching women.



			== Neo-Paladianism ==


Line 19:		Line 23:
	----		----
	'''Sources'''		'''Sources'''

	Millet, Kate: The Debate over Women. in: Vicinus, Martha (ed.): Suffer and be still. Indiana University Press, 1972. pp. 121-139.		Millet, Kate: The Debate over Women. in: Vicinus, Martha (ed.): Suffer and be still. Indiana University Press, 1972. pp. 121-139.

Retnüg at 19:23, 25 January 2010

2010-01-25T19:23:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 25 January 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:

	In trying to find an additional way to justify the seperation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other Hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankinds abilities from doubling the worlds intelectual talents by not teching women.		In trying to find an additional way to justify the seperation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other Hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankinds abilities from doubling the worlds intelectual talents by not teching women.



			----
			'''Sources'''
			Millet, Kate: The Debate over Women. in: Vicinus, Martha (ed.): Suffer and be still. Indiana University Press, 1972. pp. 121-139.

Retnüg at 19:19, 25 January 2010

2010-01-25T19:19:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 25 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Separation of the Spheres ~~(public/private; male/female)~~ ==		== Separation of the Spheres -Nature and Education ==


	In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a seperation of male and/or female roles (duties) in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties such as domestic life. The male duties can also be reffered to as ''priviledged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definiton in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination".		In the 18th century and afterwards there was one major belief towards a seperation of male and/or female roles (duties) in society. On the one hand there was the "public sphere" which was generally associated with male duties such as war, money, politics and learning, whereas on the other hand the "private sphere" was linked to female duties such as domestic life. The male duties can also be reffered to as ''priviledged duties'' whereas female duties allow a definiton in terms of ''responsibility'' in the domestic field. One could also think of a "system of subordination".

	By contrasting two literary works. firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand easily the attitudes towards the seperation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintainance of a "system of subordination"~~, however~~, the ''Subjection of Women'' attempts to expose and to break ~~the~~ "system of subordination".		By contrasting two literary works. firstly John Ruskin's "''Of Queens Gardens''" and secondly Stuart Mill's ''Subjection of Women'' one is enabled to understand easily the attitudes towards the seperation of male and female spheres. ''Of Queens Gardens'' refers to the maintainance of a "system of subordination", the ''Subjection of Women'' however attempts to expose and to break this "system of subordination".


	'''Nature'''		'''Nature'''



	~~Article~~ is ~~under construction~~.		According to Ruskin, the female role is dependant and also determined by the inherent nature and the abilities of the women themselves and equality is not possible since women are in nothing alike to men at all. This is a rather artificial approach to the seperation of the spheres and contrasts totally Mill's approach saying that the distinctions between gender temperaments and roles are culturally created and thus a result of an artificial cultivation.

	~~Separation of the Spheres in terms of gender roles. Public Sphere (men dominated) and Private Sphere (women~~'~~s sector)~~		'''Education'''

	~~== Headline text ==~~		In trying to find an additional way to justify the seperation of the spheres, Ruskin says that women are not supposed to be the object of education (language, literature etc.) for they grow like flowers. Education should be used in order to prepare them for their private duties and responsibilities, for instance being a good wife and mother. On the other Hand there is Mill developing an image of traditional education as being some kind of "mental enslavement" preventing mankinds abilities from doubling the worlds intelectual talents by not teching women.