<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AJohn_Donne</id>
	<title>Talk:John Donne - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AJohn_Donne"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Talk:John_Donne&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-11T20:01:12Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Talk:John_Donne&amp;diff=8778&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Pankratz: Created page with &#039;&quot;In contrast to the prevalent poetry in Renaissance, &quot;Metaphysical poetry is less concerned with expressing feeling than with analyzing it, with the poet exploring the recess…&#039;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://el.rub.de/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php?title=Talk:John_Donne&amp;diff=8778&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-01-10T16:45:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#039;&amp;quot;In contrast to the prevalent poetry in &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Brit-Cult/index.php/Renaissance&quot; title=&quot;Renaissance&quot;&gt;Renaissance&lt;/a&gt;, &amp;quot;Metaphysical poetry is less concerned with expressing feeling than with analyzing it, with the poet exploring the recess…&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;In contrast to the prevalent poetry in [[Renaissance]], &amp;quot;Metaphysical poetry is less concerned with expressing feeling than with analyzing it, with the poet exploring the recesses of his consciousness&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(Encyclopædia Britannica Online Academic Edition)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;: I am sorry to say, according to amongst others, Peter Hühn, this claim is wrong. Terribly wrong. No Renaissance writer aimed at mainly expressing feelings.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pankratz</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>