Royal Progress: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Tour of the monarch through the country, visiting cities and the houses of eminent aristocrats. In times without newspapers, radio and TV this was one of the few occasions were the subjects could actually see what their monarch really looked like (no, stamps were not invented then either). | Tour of the monarch through the country, visiting cities and the houses of eminent aristocrats. In times without newspapers, radio and TV this was one of the few occasions were the subjects could actually see what their monarch really looked like (no, stamps were not invented then either). [[Elizabeth I]] developed the Royal Progress to an art form and an efficient instrument of government. | ||
Elizabeth I developed the Royal Progress to an art form and an efficient instrument of government. | |||
The early Stuarts, who promoted the divine-right ideology and separated themselves from the "country", did not use royal progresses as an art form and an instrument of government. For which neglect they had to [[Civil War|pay dearly]]. | |||
Latest revision as of 09:05, 25 July 2018
Tour of the monarch through the country, visiting cities and the houses of eminent aristocrats. In times without newspapers, radio and TV this was one of the few occasions were the subjects could actually see what their monarch really looked like (no, stamps were not invented then either). Elizabeth I developed the Royal Progress to an art form and an efficient instrument of government.
The early Stuarts, who promoted the divine-right ideology and separated themselves from the "country", did not use royal progresses as an art form and an instrument of government. For which neglect they had to pay dearly.