Jump to content

Rotten borough: Difference between revisions

From British Culture
Created page with 'Rotten borough, decayed borough or pocket borough: a borough or consituency with so small a number of voters that the result of any election could easily be controlled by a patro…'
 
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Rotten borough, decayed borough or pocket borough: a borough or consituency with so small a number of voters that the result of any election could easily be controlled by a patron, e.g., a local aristocrat (who could "pocket" the borough). The second problem: A large number of rotten boroughs made elections unrepresentative because a Member of Parliament who represented ten voters wielded the same influence as one who came from a borough with an electorate of, say, one thousand people.
A borough or constituency with so small a number of voters that the result of any election could easily be controlled by a patron, e.g., a local aristocrat (who could "pocket" the borough). In addition to the possibility for corruption and patronage, a large number of rotten boroughs made elections unrepresentative because a Member of Parliament who represented ten voters from a rotten borough wielded the same influence as one who came from a borough with an electorate of, say, one thousand people.

Latest revision as of 16:01, 18 October 2010

A borough or constituency with so small a number of voters that the result of any election could easily be controlled by a patron, e.g., a local aristocrat (who could "pocket" the borough). In addition to the possibility for corruption and patronage, a large number of rotten boroughs made elections unrepresentative because a Member of Parliament who represented ten voters from a rotten borough wielded the same influence as one who came from a borough with an electorate of, say, one thousand people.