Primogeniture: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Thus, it established '''the right of the eldest son that was born to a family to inherit the complete possessions''' of his family: This meant the family's entire estate, wealth and property. | Thus, it established '''the right of the eldest son that was born to a family to inherit the complete possessions''' of his family: This meant the family's entire estate, wealth and property. | ||
Accordingly, the other children of a family were left without inheritance. | Accordingly, the other children of a family were usually left without inheritance. | ||
However, parents usually made arrangements to provide for their children's future so that they could fend for themselves in case of their parents' death. Therefore, parents sought to secure their children's adult life by education (in case of | However, parents usually made arrangements to provide for their children's future so that they could fend for themselves in case of their parents' death. Therefore, parents sought to secure their children's adult life by education (in case of younger sons)and by finding a suitable husband for daughters.In order to organize marriages, parents provided their daughters with a dowry to ensure that there was an appropriate man willing to marry the girl. | ||
The idea behind primogeniture was to secure the estate as a whole, so that it would not be divided again and again until no one could have lived of it. Thus, primogeniture was also a key factor that enabled the expansion of estates. | The idea behind primogeniture was to secure the estate as a whole, so that it would not be divided again and again until no one could have lived of it. Thus, primogeniture was also a key factor that enabled the expansion of estates. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== sources == | == sources == | ||
Woodford, Donna. "'According to my Bond.' Family Ties in | Woodford, Donna. "'According to my Bond.' Family Ties in Shakespeare's Time." ''Understanding King Lear: A Casebook to Issues, Sources and Historical Documents.'' Westport/CT and London: Greenwood Press, 2004. 85-111. | ||
--[[User:Laura|Laura]] 17:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Laura|Laura]] 17:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:58, 14 December 2009
Primogeniture was a common law that arranged the organization of inheritance. Thus, it established the right of the eldest son that was born to a family to inherit the complete possessions of his family: This meant the family's entire estate, wealth and property.
Accordingly, the other children of a family were usually left without inheritance. However, parents usually made arrangements to provide for their children's future so that they could fend for themselves in case of their parents' death. Therefore, parents sought to secure their children's adult life by education (in case of younger sons)and by finding a suitable husband for daughters.In order to organize marriages, parents provided their daughters with a dowry to ensure that there was an appropriate man willing to marry the girl.
The idea behind primogeniture was to secure the estate as a whole, so that it would not be divided again and again until no one could have lived of it. Thus, primogeniture was also a key factor that enabled the expansion of estates.
sources
Woodford, Donna. "'According to my Bond.' Family Ties in Shakespeare's Time." Understanding King Lear: A Casebook to Issues, Sources and Historical Documents. Westport/CT and London: Greenwood Press, 2004. 85-111.
--Laura 17:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)