Extended family: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Traditional family pattern that includes more than one blood- (or kin-)related family unit and "could comprise up to 50 people" [source??] | Traditional family pattern that includes more than one blood- (or kin-)related family unit and "could comprise up to 50 people" '''[source??]''' | ||
This family structure, sometimes also referred to as 'Kinship-' or 'Clan'-Family [by whom? source?], did not consist only of father, mother and children but rather included more than one related generation (grandparents, uncles, nieces, etc.) plus servants in one household. These structures developed over time - when a man got married he usually brought his wife into his childhood home and from there on the 'clan' extended. | This family structure, sometimes also referred to as 'Kinship-' or 'Clan'-Family '''[by whom? source?]''', did not consist only of father, mother and children but rather included more than one related generation (grandparents, uncles, nieces, etc.) plus servants in one household. These structures developed over time - when a man got married he usually brought his wife into his childhood home and from there on the 'clan' extended. | ||
The functions of this kinship system were social, supportive and practical: socialisation and education for the children through relatives, welfare within the family (when money or material support were needed, the family helped), law enforcement within the family (i.e., vendettas). | The functions of this kinship system were social, supportive and practical: socialisation and education for the children through relatives, welfare within the family (when money or material support were needed, the family helped), law enforcement within the family (i.e., vendettas). | ||
However, family structures also differed from area to area. In contrast to the country side, in the city centre and rich areas the 'extended family'-style was more common [on the contrary, according to Lawrence Stone: kinship in the country, nuclear family in the city. Please give sources for this claim] - households were also larger because of the higher number of servants. Another reason was the age of marriage - in the country, men and women got married at a far older age than in the city [source?? Stone claims that the marriage age depended on one's class]. At that time the parents and grandparents were not alive anymore and consequently the households were smaller. | However, family structures also differed from area to area. In contrast to the country side, in the city centre and rich areas the 'extended family'-style was more common '''[on the contrary, according to Lawrence Stone: kinship in the country, nuclear family in the city. Please give sources for this claim]''' - households were also larger because of the higher number of servants. Another reason was the age of marriage - in the country, men and women got married at a far older age than in the city '''[source?? Stone claims that the marriage age depended on one's class]'''. At that time the parents and grandparents were not alive anymore and consequently the households were smaller. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Sources | |||
== Sources == | |||
'''[Stylesheet of the Englisches Seminar??]''' | |||
http://early-moderneurope.blogspot.de/2009/10/seventeenth-century-family.html | http://early-moderneurope.blogspot.de/2009/10/seventeenth-century-family.html | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
http://www.sexarchive.info/ATLAS_EN/html/the_traditional_extended_famil.html | http://www.sexarchive.info/ATLAS_EN/html/the_traditional_extended_famil.html | ||
Merry, Mark; Baker Philip: ''Family and Household in 17th Century London'', Centre for Metropolitan History 2006 [correct bibliographical reference??] | Merry, Mark; Baker Philip: ''Family and Household in 17th Century London'', Centre for Metropolitan History 2006 '''[correct bibliographical reference??]''' | ||
Revision as of 10:28, 10 July 2013
Traditional family pattern that includes more than one blood- (or kin-)related family unit and "could comprise up to 50 people" [source??]
This family structure, sometimes also referred to as 'Kinship-' or 'Clan'-Family [by whom? source?], did not consist only of father, mother and children but rather included more than one related generation (grandparents, uncles, nieces, etc.) plus servants in one household. These structures developed over time - when a man got married he usually brought his wife into his childhood home and from there on the 'clan' extended.
The functions of this kinship system were social, supportive and practical: socialisation and education for the children through relatives, welfare within the family (when money or material support were needed, the family helped), law enforcement within the family (i.e., vendettas).
However, family structures also differed from area to area. In contrast to the country side, in the city centre and rich areas the 'extended family'-style was more common [on the contrary, according to Lawrence Stone: kinship in the country, nuclear family in the city. Please give sources for this claim] - households were also larger because of the higher number of servants. Another reason was the age of marriage - in the country, men and women got married at a far older age than in the city [source?? Stone claims that the marriage age depended on one's class]. At that time the parents and grandparents were not alive anymore and consequently the households were smaller.
Sources
[Stylesheet of the Englisches Seminar??]
http://early-moderneurope.blogspot.de/2009/10/seventeenth-century-family.html
http://www.sexarchive.info/ATLAS_EN/html/the_traditional_extended_famil.html
Merry, Mark; Baker Philip: Family and Household in 17th Century London, Centre for Metropolitan History 2006 [correct bibliographical reference??]